Enhancement to work with AWS MSK IAM Authentication #215
cookie-bytes
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yes, sure. That would actually be awesome if you could push a PR (as I wouldn't have the environment to test this). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Migration to AWS IAM has been put on the backlog for now, so we will pick this up later. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
With the introduction of IAM Authentication in AWS MSK, as outlined in this blog, https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/amazon-msk-iam-authentication-now-supports-all-programming-languages/, would you be receptive to a pull request that incorporates this feature into Silverback?
Modifications will likely be required in both the ConfluentProducerBuilder and ConfluentConsumerBuilder, as demonstrated in the Confluent example provided here https://github.com/aws/aws-msk-iam-sasl-signer-net. https://github.com/aws/aws-msk-iam-sasl-signer-net.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions