vesting.md's 'Recommendations for Production' section lists '1. Use Soroban Token Interface: Implement standard token operations for USDC' and '5. Comprehensive Tests: Achieve 95%+ test coverage' as forward-looking recommendations. But the same document's own 'Current On-Chain Integration' section already describes the real token::Client::new / .transfer() integration as implemented today, and its 'Testing' section already claims the suite 'Exceeds 95% coverage'. Presenting already-completed work as an open recommendation suggests this section wasn't updated after those features shipped, and undermines trust in the rest of the list (items 2-4 and 6-7, which may or may not still be genuinely outstanding). Review and prune this section so it only lists work that is actually still pending against the current src/lib.rs.
vesting.md's 'Recommendations for Production' section lists '1. Use Soroban Token Interface: Implement standard token operations for USDC' and '5. Comprehensive Tests: Achieve 95%+ test coverage' as forward-looking recommendations. But the same document's own 'Current On-Chain Integration' section already describes the real
token::Client::new/.transfer()integration as implemented today, and its 'Testing' section already claims the suite 'Exceeds 95% coverage'. Presenting already-completed work as an open recommendation suggests this section wasn't updated after those features shipped, and undermines trust in the rest of the list (items 2-4 and 6-7, which may or may not still be genuinely outstanding). Review and prune this section so it only lists work that is actually still pending against the current src/lib.rs.