-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathsurvey.qmd
More file actions
1257 lines (1093 loc) · 30.9 KB
/
Copy pathsurvey.qmd
File metadata and controls
1257 lines (1093 loc) · 30.9 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
---
format: html
echo: false
warning: false
---
```{r dependencies}
library(surveydown)
library(dplyr)
```
::: {#welcome .sd-page}
# Welcome to ROBINS-I v2!
This is a companion tool for RoB assessment using ROBINS-I v2.
Have fun!
```{r welcome}
sd_question(
type = "text",
id = "Reviewer",
label = "Your name:"
)
sd_question(
type = 'select',
id = 'StudyID',
label = "Which study are you assessing?",
option = c(
"#180 - (Lodha,2015)" ="study0180",
"#534 - (Al-Turkait,2022)" ="study0534",
"#545 - (Lodha,2019)" ="study0545",
"#548 - (Patel,2017)" ="study0548",
"#550 - (Taha,2014)" ="study0550",
"#769 - (Zhao,2024)" ="study0769",
"#1080 - (Szatkowski,2023)" ="study1080",
"#1356 - (Smith,2018)" ="study1356",
"#1386 - (Bairam,2018)" ="study1386",
"#1452 - (Chen,2024)" ="study1452",
"#1572 - (Dobson,2014)" ="study1572",
"#1618 - (Ji,2020)" ="study1618"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'prelimA')
```
:::
::: {#prelimA .sd-page}
# Preliminary considerations
## A. Specify the result being assessed for risk of bias
```{r pre-A}
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "A1",
label = "A1. Specify the numerical result being assessed"
)
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "A2",
label = "A2. Provide further details about this result (for example, location in the study report, reason it was chosen)"
)
sd_next(next_page = 'prelimB')
```
:::
::: {#prelimB .sd-page}
# Preliminary considerations
## B. Decide whether to proceed with a risk-of-bias assessment
```{r pre-B}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "B1",
label = "B1. Did the authors make any attempt to control for confounding?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes"= "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "B2",
label = "B2. [If N/PN to B1] Is there sufficient potential for confounding that an unadjusted result should not be considered further?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "B3",
label = "B3. Was the method of measuring the outcome inappropriate?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'prelimC')
```
:::
::: {#prelimC .sd-page}
# Preliminary considerations
## C. Specify the analysis in the current study for which results are being assessed for risk of bias
```{r pre-C}
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "C0",
label = "C0. Specify the outcome to which this result relates"
)
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "C1",
label = "C1. Specify the participant group on which this result was based."
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "C2",
label = "C2. Was the analysis based on splitting participants’ follow up time according to intervention received, or was follow-up censored when participants in one group switched to another group (e.g. when comparison group participants started the intervention)?",
option = c(
"Yes" = "Y",
"No" = "N"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "C3",
label = "C3. [If Y to C2] Were intervention discontinuations or switches likely to be related to factors that are predictive of the outcome?",
option = c(
"Yes" = "Y",
"No" = "N"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'prelimD')
```
:::
::: {#prelimD .sd-page}
# Preliminary considerations
## D. Specify a (hypothetical) target randomized trial specific to the study
```{r pre-D}
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "D1",
label = "D1. Specify the participants and eligibility criteria"
)
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "D2",
label = "D2. Specify the intervention strategy"
)
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "D3",
label = "D3. Specify the comparator strategy"
)
sd_next(next_page = 'prelimE')
```
:::
::: {#prelimE .sd-page}
# Preliminary considerations
## E. Decide on the effect of interest
```{r pre-E}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "E1",
label = "E1. What is the aim for this study?",
option = c(
"To assess the intention-to-treat effect (the effect of assignment to an intervention strategy or comparator strategy)" = "ITT",
"To assess a per-protocol effect (the effect of adhering to a specified intervention strategy or comparator strategy)" = "PP"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "textarea",
id = "E2",
label = "E2. If the aim is to assess a per-protocol effect, briefly define the changes to the intervention or comparator strategies that will be considered to be protocol deviations and, optionally, those changes that will not be considered. For example, the protocol deviations considered could be: “Starting intervention among comparator group participants, while acceptable changes could be “stopping intervention because of intervention-related toxicities occur or disease progression” or “changes to intervention after the trial baseline”."
)
sd_next(next_page = 'prelimF')
```
:::
::: {#prelimF .sd-page}
# Preliminary considerations
## F. Information sources
```{r pre-F}
sd_question(
type = 'mc_multiple',
id = 'F1',
label = "Which of the following sources have you obtained to help you inform your risk of bias judgements (tick as many as apply)?",
option = c(
"Journal article(s)" = "paper",
"Study protocol" = "protocol",
"Statistical analysis plan (SAP)" = "sap",
"Non-commercial registry record (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov record)" = "registry_nc",
"Company-owned registry record (e.g. GSK Clinical Study Register record)" = "registry_c",
"Grey literature (e.g. unpublished thesis)" = "grey",
"Conference abstract(s) " = "conference",
"Regulatory document (e.g. Clinical Study Report, Drug Approval Package)" = "regulation",
"Individual participant data" = "ipd",
"Research ethics application" = "irb",
"Grant database summary (e.g. NIH RePORTER, Research Councils UK Gateway to Research)" = "grant",
"Personal communication with investigator" = "investigator",
"Personal communication with sponsor" = "sponsor"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'Domain1')
```
:::
::: {#Domain1 .sd-page}
## Domain 1: Bias due to confounding
```{r domain1}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1a_Q1",
label = "1.1 Did the authors control for all the important confounding factors for which this was necessary?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1a_Q2",
label = "1.2 [If Y/PY/WN to 1.1] Were confounding factors that were controlled for (and for which control was necessary) measured validly and reliably by the variables available in this study?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1a_Q3",
label = "1.3 [If Y/PY/WN to 1.1] Did the authors control for any post-intervention variables that could have been affected by the intervention?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1a_Q4",
label = "1.4 Did the use of negative controls, quantitative bias analysis, or other considerations, suggest serious unmeasured confounding?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_Q1",
label = "1.1 Did the authors use an analysis method that was appropriate to control for time-varying as well as baseline confounding?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_Q2",
label = "1.2 [If Y/PY to 1.1] Did the authors control for all the important baseline and time-varying confounding factors for which this was necessary?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_Q3",
label = "1.3 [If Y/PY/WN to 1.2] Were confounding factors that were controlled for (and for which control was necessary) measured validly and reliably by the variables available in this study? ",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_Q4",
label = "1.4 [If N/PN/NI to 1.1] Did the authors control for time-varying factors or other variables measured after the start of intervention?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_Q5",
label = "1.5 Did the use of negative controls, or other considerations, suggest serious unmeasured confounding?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1a_overall",
label = "Risk of bias judgement?",
option = c(
"🟨 Low risk of bias except for concerns about uncontrolled confounding" = "low",
"🟧 Moderate risk" = "moderate",
"🟥 Serious risk" = "serious",
"☠️ Critical risk" = "critical"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1a_overall_dir",
label = "What is the predicted direction of bias in classification of interventions?",
option = c(
"Upward bias (over-estimate the effect)" = "upward",
"Downward bias (Under-estimate the effect)" = "downward",
"Unpredictable" = "unknown"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_overall",
label = "Risk of bias judgement?",
option = c(
"🟨 Low risk of bias except for concerns about uncontrolled confounding" = "low",
"🟧 Moderate risk" = "moderate",
"🟥 Serious risk" = "serious",
"☠️ Critical risk" = "critical"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D1b_overall_dir",
label = "What is the predicted direction of bias in classification of interventions?",
option = c(
"Upward bias (over-estimate the effect)" = "upward",
"Downward bias (Under-estimate the effect)" = "downward",
"Unpredictable" = "unknown"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'Domain2')
```
:::
::: {#Domain2 .sd-page}
## Domain 2: Bias in classification of interventions
```{r domain2}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_Q1",
label = "2.1 Did assignment of participants to the intervention group or the comparator group rely on events or measurements that occurred after the start of follow up?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_Q2",
label = "2.2 [If Y/PY/NI to 2.1] Were participants included in the comparator group until they fulfilled the definition of the intervention (or vice versa)?",
option = c(
"⛔ Strong Yes" = "SY",
"🔷 Weak Yes" = "WY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_Q3",
label = "2.3 [If N/PN to 2.1] Was all information used to classify intervention and comparator groups recorded at or before the time the interventions started?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_Q4",
label = "2.4 Was classification of intervention status influenced by knowledge of the outcome or risk of the outcome?",
option = c(
"⛔ Strong Yes" = "SY",
"🔷 Weak Yes" = "WY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_Q5",
label = "2.5 [If N/PN to 2.1 and WY/N/PN/NI 2.4] Was intervention status classified correctly for all, or nearly all, participants?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_overall",
label = "Risk of bias judgement?",
option = c(
"🟩 Low risk" = "low",
"🟧 Moderate risk" = "moderate",
"🟥 Serious risk" = "serious",
"☠️ Critical risk" = "critical"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D2_overall_dir",
label = "What is the predicted direction of bias in classification of interventions?",
option = c(
"Favors intervention" = "intervention",
"Favors comparator" = "comparator",
"Towards null" = "towards_null",
"Away from null" = "against_null",
"Unpredictable" = "unknown"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'Domain3')
```
:::
::: {#Domain3 .sd-page}
## Domain 3: Bias in selection of participants into the study
```{r domain3}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q01",
label = "3.1 (= 2.1) Did assignment of participants to the intervention group or the comparator group rely on events or measurements that occurred after the start of follow up?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q02",
label = "3.2 [If Y/PY to 3.1] Were participants excluded after the start of follow-up because they did not meet the definition of either the intervention or the comparator?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q03",
label = "3.3 Were start of follow-up and start of intervention the same for most participants?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q04",
label = "3.4 [If N/PN to 3.3] Is the effect of intervention expected to be constant over the time period studied?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q05",
label = "3.5 Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics observed after the start of intervention (additional to the situations addressed in 3.1 and 3.3)?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q06",
label = "3.6 [If Y/PY to 3.5] Were the post-intervention variables that influenced selection likely to be associated with intervention?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q07",
label = "3.7 [If Y/PY to 3.6] Were the post-intervention variables that influenced selection likely to be influenced by the outcome or a cause of the outcome?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q08",
label = "3.8 [If Y/PY to 3.2, N/PN to 3.4 or Y/PY to 3.7] Is it likely that the analysis corrected for all potential selection biases identified in 3.1-3.2, 3.3-3.4 or 3.5-3.7 above?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q09",
label = "3.9 [If N/PN to 3.8] Did sensitivity analyses demonstrate that the likely impact of the potential selection biases identified in 3.1-3.2, 3.3-3.4 or 3.5-3.7 was minimal?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_Q10",
label = "3.10 [If N/PN to 3.9] Were potential selection biases identified sufficiently severe that the result should not be included in a quantitative synthesis?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_overall",
label = "Risk of bias judgement?",
option = c(
"🟩 Low risk" = "low",
"🟧 Moderate risk" = "moderate",
"🟥 Serious risk" = "serious",
"☠️ Critical risk" = "critical"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D3_overall_dir",
label = "What is the predicted direction of bias in participant selection?",
option = c(
"Favours intervention" = "intervention",
"Favours comparator" = "comparator",
"Towards null" = "towards_null",
"Away from null" = "away_from_null",
"Unpredictable" = "unknown"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'Domain4')
```
:::
::: {#Domain4 .sd-page}
## Domain 4: Bias due to deviations from intended interventions
```{r domain4}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_Q1",
label = "4.1 Was the study undertaken in an experimental context?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_Q2",
label = "4.2 [If Y/PY to 4.1] Did participants deviate from the intended intervention as a result of the processes of recruiting and engaging them in the study?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_Q3",
label = "4.3 [If Y/PY to 4.1] Did study personnel consciously or unconsciously undermine implementation of the intended interventions?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_Q4",
label = "4.4 [If Y/PY/NI to 4.2 or 4.3] Were these deviations from intended intervention likely to have affected the outcome?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_Q5",
label = "4.5 Was an appropriate analysis used to estimate the effect of assignment to intervention?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_overall",
label = "Risk of bias judgement?",
option = c(
"🟩 Low risk" = "low",
"🟧 Moderate risk" = "moderate",
"🟥 Serious risk" = "serious",
"☠️ Critical risk" = "critical"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4a_overall_dir",
label = "What is the predicted direction of bias in classification of interventions?",
option = c(
"Favours intervention" = "intervention",
"Favours comparator" = "comparator",
"Towards null" = "towards_null",
"Away from null" = "away_from_null",
"Unpredictable" = "unknown"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4b_Q1",
label = "4.1 Did all or nearly all participants adhere to their assigned intervention strategy?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4b_Q2",
label = "4.2 [If N/PN/NI to 4.1] Were the protocol deviations likely to have affected the outcome?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4b_Q3",
label = "4.3 [If Y/PY to 4.2] Was an appropriate analysis used to estimate the specified per-protocol effect, accounting for the specified protocol deviations?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4b_overall",
label = "Risk of bias judgement?",
option = c(
"🟩 Low risk" = "low",
"🟧 Moderate risk" = "moderate",
"🟥 Serious risk" = "serious",
"☠️ Critical risk" = "critical"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D4b_overall_dir",
label = "What is the predicted direction of bias in classification of interventions?",
option = c(
"Favours intervention" = "intervention",
"Favours comparator" = "comparator",
"Towards null" = "towards_null",
"Away from null" = "away_from_null",
"Unpredictable" = "unknown"
)
)
sd_next(next_page = 'Domain5')
```
:::
::: {#Domain5 .sd-page}
## Domain 5: Bias due to missing data
```{r domain5}
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q01",
label = "5.1 Were complete data on intervention status available for all, or nearly all, participants?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q02",
label = "5.2 Were complete data on the outcome available for all, or nearly all, participants?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q03",
label = "5.3 Were complete data on important confounding variables available for all, or nearly all, participants?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q04",
label = "5.4 [If N/PN/NI to 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3] Is the result based on a complete case analysis?",
option = c(
"Yes" = "Y",
"Probably Yes" = "PY",
"Probably No" = "PN",
"No" = "N",
"No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q05",
label = "5.5 [If Y/PY/NI to 5.4] Was exclusion from the analysis because of missing data likely to be related to the true value of the outcome?",
option = c(
"⛔ Yes" = "Y",
"⛔ Probably Yes" = "PY",
"💚 Probably No" = "PN",
"💚 No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q06",
label = "5.6 [If Y/PY to 5.5] Is the relationship between the outcome and missingness likely to be explained by the variables in the analysis model?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q07",
label = "5.7 [If N/PN to 5.4] Was the analysis based on imputing missing values?",
option = c(
"Yes" = "Y",
"Probably Yes" = "PY",
"Probably No" = "PN",
"No" = "N",
"No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q08",
label = "5.8 [If N/PN/NI to 5.7] Is it reasonable to assume that data were ‘missing at random’ (MAR) or ‘missing completely at random’ (MCAR)?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"⛔ Probably No" = "PN",
"⛔ No" = "N",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q09",
label = "5.9 [If Y/PY to 5.8] Was imputation performed appropriately?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q10",
label = "5.10 [If N/PN/NI to 5.7] Was an appropriate alternative method used to correct for bias due to missing data?",
option = c(
"💚 Yes" = "Y",
"💚 Probably Yes" = "PY",
"🔷 Weak No" = "WN",
"⛔ Strong No" = "SN",
"🙄 No Information" = "NI"
)
)
sd_question(
type = "mc",
id = "D5_Q11",
label = "5.11 [If PN/N/NI to 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3 AND (Y/PY/NI to 5.5 OR (Y/PY to 5.8 AND WN/SN/NI to 5.9) OR WN/SN/NI to 5.10)] Is there evidence that the result was not biased by missing data?",