ospf: getting route defined in Linux. Possible simple set up problem #16005
Unanswered
colinpaicemq
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
It works with frr 8.1-1ubuntu1.9 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am trying to use ospf to connect some systems together.
On a Ubuntu Linux, I can see the OSPF definition, but there is no route defined to Linux.
For example
show ip route
K>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/600] via 192.168.1.254, wlp4s0, 01:38:03
O>* 10.1.0.0/24 [110/300] is directly connected, enp0s31f6, weight 1, 01:03:53
L>* 10.1.0.2/32 is directly connected, enp0s31f6, 01:03:53
O 10.1.1.0/24 [110/310] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6 inactive, weight 1, 01:02:58
K>* 10.1.1.0/24 [0/0] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6, 01:06:59
O 10.1.3.0/24 [110/310] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6 inactive, weight 1, 01:02:58
K>* 169.254.0.0/16 [0/1000] is directly connected, wlp4s0, 01:38:03
O 192.168.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.1.0.3, enp0s31f6 inactive, weight 1, 01:02:57
L>* 192.168.1.222/32 is directly connected, wlp4s0, 01:38:03
there is an OSPF route for 10.1.3.0/24, but there is no matching route in Linux. If I ping 10.1.3.1 it goes via the default route (wireless).
This is a pretty basic problem, so I'm guessing that this is a set up problem.
I have sysctl set (as per doc)
and a frr.conf file at my local end of
and a config at the remote end of
grepping for the IP address in the trace at my local end I get
Is there something else I need to set up?
Colin
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions