From stakeholders "It would probably be most useful if it were sorted in a taxonomy-aware manner (at least in the cases where multiple taxonomic ranks are being output), ala KrakenHLL"
This is a feature for option year we've discussed before. The idea is to run MTSv-signature at genus / family / custom lca level and collapse the nodes with large number of signature hits but low p-value (a.k.a. the Bradyrhizobium problem I've illustrated before).
From stakeholders "It would probably be most useful if it were sorted in a taxonomy-aware manner (at least in the cases where multiple taxonomic ranks are being output), ala KrakenHLL"
This is a feature for option year we've discussed before. The idea is to run MTSv-signature at genus / family / custom lca level and collapse the nodes with large number of signature hits but low p-value (a.k.a. the Bradyrhizobium problem I've illustrated before).