Overall model performance

[GustavoFacincani]

Basin	Instream Flow Requirement	Comments
stanislaus	Donnell Lake Spill	No data
	IFR at Murphys Park	Ok
	IFR bl Angels Div	Only about 10 years of data, in which the first 3-4 years the IFR followed a different pattern, some peaks not present in the observed.
	IFR bl Beardsley Afterbay	Ok, IFRs were higher before 1986, peak flows are caught but greater in the modeled data
	IFR bl Beaver Creek Diversion Dam	Good, few peaks are missed
	IFR bl Collierville PH discharge	Behavior is good, but the modeled data has many peak flows that are not present in the observed
	IFR bl confluence of NF Stanislaus and Beaver Creek	Good, few peaks are missed
	IFR bl Donnell Lake	Only ~5 years of data, first ~1.5 don't match well
	IFR bl Goodwin Reservoir	Good, although some of the small/intermediate peaks are greater in the modeled data
	IFR bl Hunter Reservoir	Bad/weird/mostly missing observed data
	IFR bl Lyons Res	Good
	IFR bl McKays Point Div	Good
	IFR bl New Spicer Meadow Reservoir	IFRs match better before 1990, after that the lower flows tend to be higher and vary more
	IFR bl NF Stanislaus Div Res	Minimum flows are higher in the observed, meanwhile the modeled data has many peaks, none present in the observed
	IFR bl Philadelphia Div	Good, although data is sparse over the years, present mostly when lower flows occur in the modeled data, when peak flows occur in the modeled data, the observed is blank
	IFR bl Pinecrest Lake	No data
	IFR bl Relief Reservoir	No data
	IFR bl Sand Bar Div	Sparse data, mostly missing;l when present, there are no peak flows, meanwhile the modeled data has many.
	IFR bl Utica Reservoir	Few consecutive months of observation during 5 years, all with low flows, meanwhile peak flows are occuring in the modeled data
	New Melones Lake Flood Control	No data
tuolumne	Don Pedro Lake Spillway	No data
	IFR at La Grange	Good, a few small peaks missed
	IFR bl Cherry Lake	Good, a few small peaks missed
	IFR bl Hetch Hetchy Reservoir	Good, a few small peaks missed
	IFR bl Lake Eleanor	Good, a few small peaks missed
	Moccasin Fish Hatchery	No data
upper_san_joaquin	IFR above Shakeflat Creek	Good, although overproducing
	IFR bl Balsam Forebay	Bad stats due to a few peak flows
	IFR bl Bass Lake	Good, although some peak flows were missed
	IFR bl Bear Div	Good
	IFR bl Big Creek 5 Div	Some high flows are missed
	IFR bl Big Creek 6 Div	Good
	IFR bl Bolsillo Creek Div	Bad/weird/mostly missing observed data
	IFR bl Browns Creek Ditch	No data
	IFR bl Camp 62 Creek Div	Bad/weird/mostly missing observed data
	IFR bl Chinquapin Creek Div	Bad/weird/mostly missing observed data
	IFR bl Hooper Creek	Good, although some peak flows were missed
	IFR bl Huntington Lake	MIFs started to be followed only recently (2010-2011, which are the latest observations used)
	IFR bl Kerckhoff Lake	Good
	IFR bl Lake Thomas A Edison	Some smaller high flows are missed meanwhile higher high flows are not present in the observed.
	IFR bl Manzanita Div	No data
	IFR bl Millerton Lake	Rules constantly changing
	IFR bl Mono Creek Div	Good, some peak flows missed in the modeled data.
	IFR bl Pitman Creek Div	Ok, some peak flows missed in the modeled data.
	IFR bl Redinger Lake	Good
	IFR bl San Joaquin 1 Div	No data
	IFR bl San Joaquin R and Willow Cr confluence	No data
	IFR bl Shaver Lake	Some peaks flows missed, the ones captured are higher in the modeled data
	IFR No. Fk. Stevenson Creek above Shaver Lake	Peak flows occurr with a certain frequency in the observed, but not in the modeled data