Is Aphrodite still actively maintained

[manian-kumaran]

Hi,

The last release was v2.4.0 in Aug 2019, and there is 0 commits since then. The commits were far in between, only 27 commits since v. 2.2.3 in Aug 2018.

I see that the main contributors are no longer with Khan. Is Aphrodite still maintained?

Thanks.

[epicfaace]

@jeresig ?

[drianoaz]

👀

[Brianzchen]

I too would also like to know. I've been using for lib forever and it's always been pretty stable, maybe it's a complete library.

I'd like to help maintain this project as I'm a huge fan if you need the help?

cc @lencioni

[jlfwong]

FWIW, I don't personally do any active development on Aphrodite any more, but I also use it in https://github.com/jlfwong/speedscope, which is actively developed.

Can't speak for other owners/contributors, but I'm unlikely to add any significant contributions to Aphrodite going forward, but it's also not obvious that any significant changes are necessary for it to serve its purpose.

[Brianzchen]

@jlfwong Thanks so much for replying, didn't think I'd get a reply from a collaborator 😄

I get that super active maintenance of this lib probably isn't necessary. But my interest is really triggered by a few main reasons

• 2.4.0 #382 This PR hasn't been merged despite having been approved and actually released last year
• And when I was exploring my node_modules/aphrodite as a flow user, the fact that this lib ships the flow config causes my flow sever to crash. Some healthy maintenance in what's published would be nice.
• I've recently added flow definitions to flow-typed. It would be nice to add them directly to this project given it's written with flow, but seems like there's no maintainers Update and expose flow? #391

[jlfwong]

I just merged #382 since it looks like it's authored by a core contributor and was approved by a KA employee.

I'm happy to merge updates to flow typings as long as you're willing to own any issues that arise in response to the merge @Brianzchen. I haven't published this repo in a very long time, however, so I might prefer to leave that to someone else, and I'm not totally sure who the right person to do that is any more.