|
| 1 | +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT |
| 2 | +pragma solidity ^0.8.28; |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +import {UniversalTest} from "./UniversalTest.t.sol"; |
| 5 | +import {LibProvingPeriod} from "src/libs/LibProvingPeriod.sol"; |
| 6 | +import {BaseProverManager} from "src/protocol/BaseProverManager.sol"; |
| 7 | +import {IProverManager} from "src/protocol/IProverManager.sol"; |
| 8 | +import {IInbox} from "src/protocol/IInbox.sol"; |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +/// Represents states where the current period is open and has no prover |
| 11 | +abstract contract CurrentPeriodIsVacant is UniversalTest { |
| 12 | + // This is a sanity check to ensure we're in the expected state |
| 13 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_confirmPreconditions() public view { |
| 14 | + LibProvingPeriod.Period memory period = proverManager.getPeriod(proverManager.currentPeriodId()); |
| 15 | + assertEq(period.end, 0, "Period is not open"); |
| 16 | + assertEq(period.prover, address(0), "Period has prover"); |
| 17 | + // this is not part of the definition of "vacant" but it should be impossible to get into a situation |
| 18 | + // where there is a fee and no prover |
| 19 | + assertEq(period.fee, 0, "Period has non-zero fee"); |
| 20 | + } |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_payPublicationFee_shouldChargeNoRegularFee() public { |
| 23 | + uint256 balanceBefore = proverManager.balances(proposer); |
| 24 | + vm.prank(address(inbox)); |
| 25 | + proverManager.payPublicationFee(proposer, false); |
| 26 | + uint256 balanceAfter = proverManager.balances(proposer); |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + assertEq(balanceBefore, balanceAfter, "Proposer balance changed"); |
| 29 | + } |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_payPublicationFee_shouldChargeNoDelayedFee() public { |
| 32 | + uint256 balanceBefore = proverManager.balances(proposer); |
| 33 | + vm.prank(address(inbox)); |
| 34 | + proverManager.payPublicationFee(proposer, true); |
| 35 | + uint256 balanceAfter = proverManager.balances(proposer); |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + assertEq(balanceBefore, balanceAfter, "Proposer balance changed"); |
| 38 | + } |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_bid_shouldRevertOnZeroBid() public { |
| 41 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 42 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 43 | + vm.expectRevert(BaseProverManager.OfferedFeeTooHigh.selector); |
| 44 | + proverManager.bid(0); |
| 45 | + } |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_evictProver_shouldRevert() public { |
| 48 | + IInbox.PublicationHeader memory header; |
| 49 | + header.timestamp = vm.getBlockTimestamp() - proverManager.livenessWindow() - 1; |
| 50 | + header.id = checkpointTracker.LAST_PROVEN_ID() + 1; |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | + vm.prank(evictor); |
| 53 | + vm.expectRevert(BaseProverManager.PeriodNotInitialized.selector); |
| 54 | + proverManager.evictProver(header); |
| 55 | + } |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_claimProvingVacancy_shouldClosePeriod() public { |
| 58 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 59 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 60 | + proverManager.claimProvingVacancy(initialFee); |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + LibProvingPeriod.Period memory period = proverManager.getPeriod(proverManager.currentPeriodId()); |
| 63 | + assertEq(period.end, vm.getBlockTimestamp(), "End timestamp set incorrectly"); |
| 64 | + assertEq(period.deadline, period.end, "Proving deadline does not match end timestamp"); |
| 65 | + } |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_claimProvingVacancy_shouldLeaveOtherFieldsUnchanged() public { |
| 68 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 69 | + uint256 periodId = proverManager.currentPeriodId(); |
| 70 | + LibProvingPeriod.Period memory periodBefore = proverManager.getPeriod(periodId); |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 73 | + proverManager.claimProvingVacancy(initialFee); |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | + LibProvingPeriod.Period memory periodAfter = proverManager.getPeriod(periodId); |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | + assertEq(periodBefore.prover, periodAfter.prover, "Prover changed"); |
| 78 | + assertEq(periodBefore.stake, periodAfter.stake, "Stake changed"); |
| 79 | + assertEq(periodBefore.fee, periodAfter.fee, "Fee changed"); |
| 80 | + assertEq(periodBefore.delayedFeePercentage, periodAfter.delayedFeePercentage, "Delayed fee changed"); |
| 81 | + assertEq(periodBefore.pastDeadline, false, "Period had missed deadline"); |
| 82 | + assertEq(periodAfter.pastDeadline, false, "Period has missed deadline"); |
| 83 | + } |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_claimProvingVacancy_shouldDeductLivenessBond() public { |
| 86 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 87 | + uint256 balanceBefore = proverManager.balances(proverA); |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 90 | + proverManager.claimProvingVacancy(initialFee); |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + uint256 balanceAfter = proverManager.balances(proverA); |
| 93 | + assertEq(balanceAfter, balanceBefore - proverManager.livenessBond(), "Balance deducted incorrectly"); |
| 94 | + } |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_claimProvingVacancy_shouldInitializeNextPeriod() public { |
| 97 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 98 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 99 | + proverManager.claimProvingVacancy(initialFee); |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | + LibProvingPeriod.Period memory period = proverManager.getPeriod(proverManager.currentPeriodId() + 1); |
| 102 | + assertEq(period.prover, proverA, "Prover set incorrectly"); |
| 103 | + assertEq(period.stake, proverManager.livenessBond(), "Stake set incorrectly"); |
| 104 | + assertEq(period.fee, initialFee, "Fee set incorrectly"); |
| 105 | + assertEq(period.delayedFeePercentage, proverManager.delayedFeePercentage(), "Delayed fee set incorrectly"); |
| 106 | + assertEq(period.end, 0, "Next period is closed"); |
| 107 | + assertEq(period.deadline, 0, "Next period has deadline"); |
| 108 | + assertEq(period.pastDeadline, false, "Next period has missed deadline"); |
| 109 | + } |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_claimProvingVacancy_shouldEmitEvent() public { |
| 112 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 113 | + uint256 nextPeriodId = proverManager.currentPeriodId() + 1; |
| 114 | + uint96 bond = proverManager.livenessBond(); |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 117 | + vm.expectEmit(); |
| 118 | + emit IProverManager.ProverVacancyClaimed(proverA, nextPeriodId, initialFee, bond); |
| 119 | + proverManager.claimProvingVacancy(initialFee); |
| 120 | + } |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | + function test_CurrentPeriodIsVacant_claimProvingVacancy_shouldAllowZeroFee() public { |
| 123 | + _deposit(proverA, DEPOSIT_AMOUNT); |
| 124 | + vm.prank(proverA); |
| 125 | + proverManager.claimProvingVacancy(0); |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | + LibProvingPeriod.Period memory period = proverManager.getPeriod(proverManager.currentPeriodId() + 1); |
| 128 | + assertEq(period.prover, proverA, "Prover set incorrectly"); |
| 129 | + assertEq(period.fee, 0, "Fee set incorrectly"); |
| 130 | + } |
| 131 | +} |
0 commit comments