Skip to content

Naming convention between 2F-85 and 2F-140 different #66

@karanchahal

Description

@karanchahal

Hello,

We are trying to use this package for both 2F-140 and 2F-85 URDF files, but we notice that the naming convention is very different for the link names between the two.

Why is this the case and can we unify them ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions