We tested various algorithms—including pi0, pi0.5, wall-x, and LingBot-VLA—on robotic arms with different humanoid configurations. The success rates for many basic tasks were relatively low. To control for variables, we used standardized camera hardware and maintained consistent environmental lighting conditions. However, the success rate for humanoid robots was significantly lower than that for single-arm robotic arms. I would like to know if the experimental results for LingBot are consistent with this trend. If not, does the LingBot lab have any specific training methods or parameters for humanoid robots that they can share?
We tested various algorithms—including pi0, pi0.5, wall-x, and LingBot-VLA—on robotic arms with different humanoid configurations. The success rates for many basic tasks were relatively low. To control for variables, we used standardized camera hardware and maintained consistent environmental lighting conditions. However, the success rate for humanoid robots was significantly lower than that for single-arm robotic arms. I would like to know if the experimental results for LingBot are consistent with this trend. If not, does the LingBot lab have any specific training methods or parameters for humanoid robots that they can share?