@@ -1046,6 +1046,93 @@ theorem alphaWeight_zero_cleared_iff_divWeight_zero_cleared
10461046 · exact DivWeightLe_zero_cleared.of_alphaWeight_zero_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH
10471047 · exact AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_zero_cleared.of_divWeight_zero_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH
10481048
1049+ /-! ### 2c. The cleared *successor* target — the `t + 1` analogue of the cleared base witness
1050+
1051+ The cleared base witness (`alphaWeight_zero_cleared_fixed`) sidesteps the `α₀ = T/W` regularity
1052+ obstruction by multiplying through the single `W` factor: `βHensel 0` *itself* (not a quotient)
1053+ is the witness, so no `W𝒪`-divisibility is required. The same structural move works at every
1054+ successor order: clearing the full `W^{t+2}·ξ^{2t+1}` denominator of `αGenuine (t+1)` turns the
1055+ target into one whose witness is `βHensel (t+1)` itself, supplied directly by the lift identity.
1056+
1057+ The genuine residual therefore separates cleanly: existence of the cleared 𝒪-preimage is
1058+ *unconditional* given the lift identity (no `W`/`ξ`-divisibility obstruction survives clearing),
1059+ and the *only* remaining content is the weight bound on `βHensel (t+1)` — the documented per-term
1060+ WALL for `t ≥ 1`, and PROVEN unconditionally for `t = 0` (`βHensel_weight_bound_zero`). -/
1061+
1062+ /-- The cleared successor target: after clearing the full `W^{t+2}·ξ^{2t+1}` denominator off
1063+ `αGenuine (t+1)`, the cleared coefficient has an 𝒪-preimage of `Λ_𝒪`-weight `≤ B`. -/
1064+ def AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared (x₀ : F) (R : F[X][X][Y])
1065+ (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) (D : ℕ) (t : ℕ) (B : ℕ) : Prop :=
1066+ ∃ a : 𝒪 H,
1067+ embeddingOf𝒪Into𝕃 H a =
1068+ αGenuine H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )
1069+ * (liftToFunctionField (H := H) H.leadingCoeff) ^ (t + 1 + 1 )
1070+ * (embeddingOf𝒪Into𝕃 H (ClaimA2.ξ x₀ R H hHyp)) ^ (2 * (t + 1 ) - 1 )
1071+ ∧ weight_Λ_over_𝒪 hH a D ≤ WithBot.some B
1072+
1073+ /-- **Cleared successor witness from the lift identity.** The successor analogue of
1074+ `alphaWeight_zero_cleared_fixed`: `βHensel (t+1)` *itself* discharges the cleared successor target.
1075+ The lift identity says its embedding is exactly the cleared coefficient, and any proven
1076+ `Λ_𝒪`-bound `B` on `βHensel (t+1)` is the witness weight. Unlike the un-cleared
1077+ `AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe`, no `W`-divisibility obstruction arises — clearing keeps the witness
1078+ in `𝒪`. The residual is *only* the weight bound `hB` (the per-term WALL for `t ≥ 1`). -/
1079+ theorem AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_lift (x₀ : F) (R : F[X][X][Y])
1080+ (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) {D : ℕ} (t : ℕ) {B : ℕ}
1081+ (hlift :
1082+ embeddingOf𝒪Into𝕃 H (βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 ))
1083+ = αGenuine H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )
1084+ * (liftToFunctionField (H := H) H.leadingCoeff) ^ (t + 1 + 1 )
1085+ * (embeddingOf𝒪Into𝕃 H (ClaimA2.ξ x₀ R H hHyp)) ^ (2 * (t + 1 ) - 1 ))
1086+ (hB : weight_Λ_over_𝒪 hH (βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )) D ≤ WithBot.some B) :
1087+ AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH D t B :=
1088+ ⟨βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 ), hlift, hB⟩
1089+
1090+ /-- The cleared successor beta-side target: `βHensel (t+1)` itself has a weight-`≤ B`
1091+ representative. This is the `t + 1` analogue of `DivWeightLe_zero_cleared`. -/
1092+ def DivWeightLe_succ_cleared (x₀ : F) (R : F[X][X][Y])
1093+ (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) (D : ℕ) (t : ℕ) (B : ℕ) : Prop :=
1094+ ∃ a : 𝒪 H,
1095+ βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 ) = a ∧ weight_Λ_over_𝒪 hH a D ≤ WithBot.some B
1096+
1097+ /-- Build the cleared successor div-weight target from the direct beta-side weight bound. -/
1098+ theorem DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_betaWeight (x₀ : F) (R : F[X][X][Y])
1099+ (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) {D : ℕ} (t : ℕ) {B : ℕ}
1100+ (hwt : weight_Λ_over_𝒪 hH (βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )) D ≤ WithBot.some B) :
1101+ DivWeightLe_succ_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH D t B :=
1102+ ⟨βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 ), rfl, hwt⟩
1103+
1104+ /-- Project the direct beta-side weight bound from the cleared successor div-weight target. -/
1105+ theorem DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.betaWeight (x₀ : F) (R : F[X][X][Y])
1106+ (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) {D : ℕ} {t : ℕ} {B : ℕ}
1107+ (hdiv : DivWeightLe_succ_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH D t B) :
1108+ weight_Λ_over_𝒪 hH (βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )) D ≤ WithBot.some B := by
1109+ obtain ⟨a, hβ, hwt⟩ := hdiv
1110+ simpa [hβ] using hwt
1111+
1112+ /-- The cleared successor div-weight target is exactly the beta-side weight bound. -/
1113+ theorem divWeight_succ_cleared_iff_betaWeight_succ (x₀ : F) (R : F[X][X][Y])
1114+ (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) (D : ℕ) (t : ℕ) (B : ℕ) :
1115+ DivWeightLe_succ_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH D t B ↔
1116+ weight_Λ_over_𝒪 hH (βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )) D ≤ WithBot.some B := by
1117+ constructor
1118+ · exact DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.betaWeight H x₀ R hHyp hH
1119+ · exact DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_betaWeight H x₀ R hHyp hH t
1120+
1121+ /-- Transport the cleared successor div-weight target to the cleared alpha successor target,
1122+ given the lift identity at `t + 1`. The cleared coefficient's 𝒪-preimage is `βHensel (t+1)`. -/
1123+ theorem AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_divWeight_succ_cleared (x₀ : F)
1124+ (R : F[X][X][Y]) (hHyp : ClaimA2.Hypotheses x₀ R H) (hH : 0 < H.natDegree) {D : ℕ} (t : ℕ)
1125+ {B : ℕ}
1126+ (hlift :
1127+ embeddingOf𝒪Into𝕃 H (βHensel H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 ))
1128+ = αGenuine H x₀ R hHyp (t + 1 )
1129+ * (liftToFunctionField (H := H) H.leadingCoeff) ^ (t + 1 + 1 )
1130+ * (embeddingOf𝒪Into𝕃 H (ClaimA2.ξ x₀ R H hHyp)) ^ (2 * (t + 1 ) - 1 ))
1131+ (hdiv : DivWeightLe_succ_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH D t B) :
1132+ AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared H x₀ R hHyp hH D t B :=
1133+ AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_lift H x₀ R hHyp hH t hlift
1134+ (DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.betaWeight H x₀ R hHyp hH hdiv)
1135+
10491136/-- **Corollary: `W𝒪 ∣ βHensel 0` is *necessary* for `AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe`.** If the carved
10501137link holds (at the `t = 0` instance), then `W𝒪` divides `βHensel 0` in `𝒪 H`. This is the precise,
10511138machine-checked statement of the `α₀ = T/W` regularity obstruction: the carve forces a clearing
@@ -1572,6 +1659,12 @@ end BCIKS20.HenselNumerator
15721659#print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.DivWeightLe_zero_cleared.of_alphaWeight_zero_cleared
15731660#print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_zero_cleared.of_divWeight_zero_cleared
15741661#print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.alphaWeight_zero_cleared_iff_divWeight_zero_cleared
1662+ #print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared
1663+ #print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_lift
1664+ #print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_betaWeight
1665+ #print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.DivWeightLe_succ_cleared.betaWeight
1666+ #print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.divWeight_succ_cleared_iff_betaWeight_succ
1667+ #print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_succ_cleared.of_divWeight_succ_cleared
15751668#print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.W𝒪_dvd_βHensel_zero_of_alphaWeight
15761669#print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.DivWeightLe_zero.of_alphaWeight_zero
15771670#print axioms BCIKS20.HenselNumerator.AlphaWeight.AlphaGenuineRegularWeightLe_zero.of_divWeight_zero
0 commit comments