Also, the id was added, but it is not used anywhere, so this addition doesn't add what it should be adding at the moment, everything is still by reference. We need the facade and use cases to use id, not the bip329 reference, otherwise there is still no way to edit a label cleanly and easily.

[ethicnology]

[ethicnology]

@kumulynja reference in this feature is the name of what the label is referring to, it's not Bip329.

[kumulynja]

reference in this feature is the name of what the label is referring to, it's not Bip329.

No, from the reference you could derive what it might be referring to, it doesn't explictly say what it refers to.
And you can derive it only because of the bip329 spec defined the derivation of the thing from the reference.
In our domain, the thing it refers to should be explicit.