-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
NetEase Games #8
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
safe art/creatorSuggestions of art/creator who does not use AISuggestions of art/creator who does not use AIsource neededSafe art/creator who is claimed to be safe, but doesn't have source to proveSafe art/creator who is claimed to be safe, but doesn't have source to provetype: gamesRelates to games, game developers or publishersRelates to games, game developers or publishers
Description
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
safe art/creatorSuggestions of art/creator who does not use AISuggestions of art/creator who does not use AIsource neededSafe art/creator who is claimed to be safe, but doesn't have source to proveSafe art/creator who is claimed to be safe, but doesn't have source to provetype: gamesRelates to games, game developers or publishersRelates to games, game developers or publishers
According to this Twitter post, NetEase Games "implemented a company-wide policy banning AI use in game development across all its studios and projects". Could be worth checking it out, providing reliable sources and so on. I'd put them into creators similarly to Hooded Horse and RWS, with note that they experimented with AI in the past, because it'd be useful context. Since it's a publisher, I would be careful with putting games explicitly, too.
(it also begs a question if we shouldn't have something like "publisher list" under games that is not under creators?)