Refine and extend Five for the Future

[gusaus]

Last year, @harishankerr published a blog post requesting feedback from contributors on how to improve the contributor journey of WordPress. The post was followed up by a session on Five for the Future at the recent WordPress Community Summit.

Around the same time the Sustainability Team become official (see this post about the teams formation, purpose, and goals), added this project to the Sustainability roadmap, and started exploring ways to contribute and collaborate.

Then in early 2024, @naokomc posted this call for mentees, mentors, and project ideas for the next Contributor Mentorship Program Cohort. Sustainability team members answered this call by not only applying to become mentors but collaborating and contributing in related meetings, issues, and discussions.

Finally @harishankerr posted this proposal with actionable recommendations based on Community Summit discussions.

Recommended Action Items

What follows below are recommendations from the aforementioned proposal along with related projects and ideas from Sustainability and other teams.

We'll keep this section updated based on feedback in the proposal, comments in this issue, and related discussions.

Process Improvement

• Implement the Make/Contributor Tool into contributor recruitment for Five for the Future.
• Establish constant communications with current and new pledgees to help them stay active (automated email check-ins for existing pledges and email onboarding for new pledgees)
• Improve Onboarding Processes for Make/Teams – Identifying and sharing impactful projects for teams, standardizing handbooks, simplifying team handbooks, and onboarding.
• Treat 5ftF Sponsorship like WordCamp sponsorships with similar benefits.

Related Projects

• Help connect and streamline collaboration between Make Teams and community contributors #14 (Community, Training, Documentation, Marketing, and Sustainability teams)
  • Create standardized list of Team roles, skills, and commitments
  • Provide clear/easy entry points for contributing to multiple Teams
  • Provide clear/easy entry points for paid/sponsored contributions

Sponsorship

• Task-based or project-based contributor sponsorships, companies sponsor contributor time for a certain task or project in a Make/Team.
• Project/release-based contributor sponsorships where companies could sponsor external contributors for a limited time as they work on specific projects.

Related projects

• Explore and enable options for funding community projects, teams, working groups, and contributors #15 (Contributor Working Group, Community, Training, Documentation, Marketing, and Sustainability teams)
  • Adopt and integrate Open Collective #24
  • Leverage and Extend the FundOSS fundraising format #22
  • Leverage and contribute to the Open Website Alliance #19
• Contribute to the Dashboard Initiative #10 (Contributor Working Group, Community, Training, Documentation, Marketing, Meta, and Sustainability teams)
  • Create a Marketplace listing companies which provide WordPress-related services, hosting, training, books, and more.
  • Create automated crediting system to recognize the contributions of both individual contributors and their organizational sponsors, and to begin measuring the contribution ecosystem that supports WordPress
    • Recognize individual contributors for their work
    • Recognize organizational sponsors for their contributions
    • Recognize financial contributions
  • Incentive contribution by tying the crediting system to the WordPress services marketplace ranking

Mentorship

• To Provide dedicated mentoring and onboarding for Five for the Future companies and self-sponsored contributors.
• Helping companies set up contribution teams and onboarding sponsored contributors to Make/Teams
• 1:1 or group mentorship to help self-sponsored contributors onboard effectively.

Related projects

• Extend the do_action hackathon format #21 Refresh and revitalize the contributor and leadership pipelines #18 (Community, Training, Documentation, Marketing, and Sustainability teams)
  • Extend the Contributor Mentorship Program so that all Teams can onboard and train new contributors.
  • Create/extend teaching curriculum (see this comment for additional detail/context)
  • Define and document contributor roles
  • Create learning pathways for each contributor role

Reference/resources

• Proposal: Updates to Five for the Future from the Community Summit
• Refining Five for the Future For a Robust WordPress Community
• Request for Feedback: How can we Improve the Five for the Future Contributor Journey?

[gusaus]

While the issue description isn't compelling (at this point) the comments and discussions referenced should provide context (until a project manager takes this over). I'll also reference this SustainWP podcast episode where several Sustainability Team (reps and members) delve into solving similar problems and solutions.

Ideally we can join up to refine and extend Five for the Future so it enables a larger, more diverse, inclusive community.

[gusaus]

Following up on the last comment (after listening to most of the referenced episode). First we should loop in @harishankerr and other Five for the Future leads. Also seems like there are other teams (like Meta and Community) that should be involved (and lead?).

Also would like to elaborate on some of the references in the description.

As noted in the community summit discussion, it's already possible to further the goals of 5ftF by:

Integrating funding tools into WordPress.org could be a solution as it would provide a centralized way to discover, fund, and receive credit for sponsoring projects, individuals, or even teams. By providing the same fiscal host options as GitHub Sponsors, funding would flow independently of WordPress Foundation, Automattic, or other official org or entity.

If tied in with an automated crediting system, in-kind and financial sponsors could receive credit (like logos and badges) in a uniform way.

While this is obviously a non-technical overview, all of this is something the Drupal project and community are currently working on. Not only is making the tools and processes available to other open source projects like WordPress a goal, it’s a priority for the working group we’re part of in Open Collective’s Community.

In the year since the original comment (in a post about Open Source and how we sustain ourselves), there seems to be complimentary projects (like the Dashboard Initiative #10) and more interest in cross-project collaboration and resource pooling (between projects like WordPress, Drupal, Open Collective, CHAOSS, and more), it there was stakeholder interest and support to make some much needed improvements, we could make it so!

[gusaus]

Circling back here to note @harishankerr just posted the following P2 Proposal: Updates to Five for the Future from the Community Summit

Haven't had a chance to reconcile with suggestions in this issue, but considering we've been collaborating and submitting project ideas for the upcoming Contributor Mentorship Program Cohort, there could be additional source material for collaboration and mentorship project ideas.

[gusaus]

Skimming through the P2 proposal and realizing there are several roadmap items and/or mentorship project ideas that overlap including the following:

• Help connect and streamline collaboration between Make Teams and community contributors #14
• Explore and enable options for funding community projects, teams, working groups, and contributors #15
• Refresh and revitalize the contributor and leadership pipelines #18
• Leverage and Extend the FundOSS fundraising format #22
• Contribute to the Dashboard Initiative #10

[naokomc]

I will share my thoughts on our collaboration opportunities based on the Five for the Future project point of view. I distilled them into three questions (the line starting with 💡) – I hope this is helpful! 😄

Process Improvement (Onboarding and Mentorship)

Both 5ftF and the Sustainability Team see contributor onboarding and mentorship as priorities.

Sustainability

• Refresh and revitalize the contributor and leadership pipelines #18
  • Extend the Contributor Mentorship Program so that all Teams can onboard and train new contributors.
• Extend the do_action hackathon format #21

5ftF

• To Provide dedicated mentoring and onboarding for Five for the Future companies and self-sponsored contributors.
• Helping companies set up contribution teams and onboarding sponsored contributors to Make/Teams.
• 1:1 or group mentorship to help self-sponsored contributors onboard effectively.

Enhancing the mentorship program with increased structure and consistency can foster mentorship across the board for both companies and individual contributors. This requires establishing well-defined guidelines, providing resources, and creating support systems to facilitate contributions.

💡 Would there be interest in joining forces to enhance our onboarding processes and mentoring programs?

Sponsorship

Sustainability

• Explore and enable options for funding community projects, teams, working groups, and contributors #15

5ftF

• Task-based or project-based contributor sponsorships, companies sponsor contributor time for a certain task or project in a Make/Team.
• Project/release-based contributor sponsorships where companies could sponsor external contributors for a limited time as they work on specific projects.

We've learned that the Five for the Future companies are often looking for tangible proof or metrics to demonstrate the impact made by their sponsored contributors.

For instance (although this is not a contributor sponsorship example), numerous companies have sponsored WordCamps worldwide, directing their funds toward the events. This demonstrates that companies recognize the value in financially supporting a project where they can gain visibility as sponsors and directly observe the outcomes of their contributions.

💡 Can we collaborate on figuring out a sponsorship model that can sustainably benefit the project and the companies & contributors in the ecosystem?

Visualization (Dashboard)

Sponsorship

Sustainability

• Contribute to the Dashboard Initiative #10

5ftF

• Create team health dashboards for all Make/Teams, which help contributors identify impactful projects and areas that need help (Already underway).

💡 How about we collaborate on researching/defining the Dashboard elements that can indicate the project's sustainability?

[gusaus]

@naokomc really appreciate you taking the time to associate 5ftF goals with overlapping roadmap projects!

From my perspective (as a team/community member interested in all the areas being outlined) we're already collaborating/contributing as individuals, but we don't yet have the structure or capacity to contribute as a team.

However if all the overlapping projects we're identifying here were owned and/or managed by members of the Contributor Working Group (that consists of mentors, reps, and facilitators from multiple teams) we'd be able to solve both problems as goals/outcomes would benefit this (and every team).

Does that make sense?

[naokomc]

Very true, we're already collaborating as individuals but that's separate from team collaboration.
If structure or capacity are blockers, it might be most effective to keep the current way where we all stay involved in projects and initiatives as we can.

The Contributor Working Group is currently focusing on the mentorship program only. I'm sure many are also interested in the areas I mentioned in the above comment, but the management of the Five for the Future program is mainly done through this GitHub repository.

One thing we can start doing is incorporating what's happening with the Five for the Future project and Sustainability Team (in the area of contributor sustainability) to the regular Contributor Working Group meetings.

[gusaus]

The Contributor Working Group is currently focusing on the mentorship program only.

Apologies for misunderstanding. My assumptions were based on the following clarifications in the Recap of the Contributor Working Group’s Mentorship Chat on December 21, 2023 (and related discussions) was that both programs are owned/managed by the Contributor Working Group.

Five for the Future
Starting in the new year, our group will start looking at the Five for the Future program as well. Group members are encouraged to share their feedback on the program in the Five for the Future GitHub Repository. Folks can create documentation for the 5ftF contributors, please add it to the GH repository. You can also review existing issues and share any feedback as required too.

If yes, I think all the projects referenced (and probably some other roadmap ideas overlap with goals and needs of either/both programs.

Does that make sense?