This issue should be discussed after the initial drafts for necessary designs. It can also be reopened as needed.
It’s important to consider the design implications for not only different disabilities, but also different types of assistive technology. The design should be able to either adapt to the different needs, or offer an equivalent alternative (think transcripts for podcasts or closed captioning for videos). Look through the following scenarios, consider which points apply, and then evaluate with your team whether the design successfully addresses each one.
Keep this ticket open until all design iterations are finished, there are no outstanding questions or concerns, and you are confident that the design can accommodate each of the scenarios and points, below.
Scenarios
Sighted person using a mouth stick
Sighted person using voice control
Sighted person with ADHD using a screen reader
Visually impaired person using screen magnification
Deaf person using a keyboard
This issue should be discussed after the initial drafts for necessary designs. It can also be reopened as needed.
It’s important to consider the design implications for not only different disabilities, but also different types of assistive technology. The design should be able to either adapt to the different needs, or offer an equivalent alternative (think transcripts for podcasts or closed captioning for videos). Look through the following scenarios, consider which points apply, and then evaluate with your team whether the design successfully addresses each one.
Keep this ticket open until all design iterations are finished, there are no outstanding questions or concerns, and you are confident that the design can accommodate each of the scenarios and points, below.
Scenarios
Sighted person using a mouth stick
Sighted person using voice control
Sighted person with ADHD using a screen reader
Visually impaired person using screen magnification
320px? SC 1.4.10320pxand or with the text scaled 200%? SC 1.4.4Deaf person using a keyboard