AI Sherlock / AI 福尔摩斯:只接手核心论文,专门拆证据链。
deep-paper-reading-skill is a public demonstration Skill for rigorous deep reading of one selected academic paper. It is designed to work after a first-pass triage step such as paper-triage-skill.
The idea is simple:
AI Watson -> selects the paper worth reading
AI Sherlock -> asks whether the claims are actually supported
This repository is a public Skill prototype and output-contract demo. It shows the workflow, example inputs, example outputs, and a handoff format for group-meeting preparation.
It is not a deterministic automation engine that automatically verifies any paper end-to-end. Treat it as an Agent-assisted deep-reading workflow: useful for structure, critique, and verification reminders, but not a replacement for reading the original paper.
- Reads one selected core paper or structured paper notes.
- Separates author claims, evidence, and reader inference.
- Builds a claim-evidence matrix.
- Flags weak support, possible overclaims, and places requiring original-paper verification.
- Reviews methods, data, figures, tables, limitations, and failure cases.
- Generates advisor / group-meeting questions.
- Creates a handoff file for group-meeting PPT preparation.
- It does not replace full-text reading.
- It does not fabricate data, citations, paper claims, figures, or conclusions.
- It does not guarantee that a paper is correct.
- It does not guarantee supervisor approval, grades, acceptance, or publication.
- It does not expose hidden scoring weights, private prompt chains, or internal quality gates.
Copy or reference the Skill folder:
skills/deep-paper-reading-skill
Example request:
Use deep-paper-reading-skill.
Current task:
Prepare a 15-minute group meeting about one core paper.
Research direction:
AI-assisted literature review workflows for graduate students.
Paper material:
Paste the paper title, abstract, key method section, results summary, and important figure/table captions here.
Need:
Create a claim-evidence matrix, likely advisor questions, and a verification checklist.
Expected output:
deep_reading_report.mdclaim_evidence_matrix.mdfigure_table_review.mdadvisor_questions.mdverification_checklist.mdhandoff_to_group_meeting.mdhandoff_to_group_meeting.json
examples/sample-output/
deep_reading_report.md
claim_evidence_matrix.md
figure_table_review.md
advisor_questions.md
verification_checklist.md
handoff_to_group_meeting.md
handoff_to_group_meeting.json
See:
- sample-core-paper-input.md
- deep_reading_report.md
- claim_evidence_matrix.md
- handoff_to_group_meeting.md
candidate papers
-> paper-triage-skill
-> reading queue
-> selected core paper
-> deep-paper-reading-skill
-> evidence audit + advisor questions
-> group-meeting-ppt-skill
The public workflow is intentionally transparent but not overexposed. It shows the output shape and reading logic, but not hidden scoring weights or private prompt chains.
python -m unittest discover -s tests -vMIT License. See LICENSE.
