Skip to content

Make the storage backend configurable #337

Description

@fsmanuel

The discussion about suporting more storage backends has been sitting there for a while now #153, #255

The main blocker is that it requires an async api to the storage as both localForage and chrome.storage.local have an async api.

To not have breaking changes we would need to support both sync and async apis and a clear path to let the users migrate to the async api.

  • Implement async version
  • Document usage of sync and async api

Join the discussion: #338

Refs:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions