You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Source says so plainly, render-verification.ts:426: "Today no producer wires it — pure scaffold."
Why this is the sharpest of the scaffold findings
The second-LLM cross-check is the only mechanism in the codebase designed to break the self-attestation loop. Its instruction is exactly right — hand a second, independent model the raw signable bytes and tell it "Do NOT trust payload.description or payload.decoded — the threat is precisely that the first agent narrates X while signing Y."
That is the correct answer to the untrusted-verifier problem. It is scaffold.
Process defect underneath the code defect
#501 closed as delivered. What shipped was a renderer plus a green test over a flag nothing can set. The suite passes; the control does not exist. A passing test over dead scaffold is worse than no test — it reads as coverage.
Worth asking whether other closed security issues have the same shape (#460 is one — producer half only).
Verified against canonical
agenthillmain504dac0.Defect
secondLlmRequiredis unreachable. Falsifier run — the symbol appears at:src/types/index.ts:1393(definition)src/signing/render-verification.ts:380,428(renderer)test/second-llm-required-flag.test.ts(test)Nowhere else. No producer sets it.
Source says so plainly,
render-verification.ts:426: "Today no producer wires it — pure scaffold."Why this is the sharpest of the scaffold findings
The second-LLM cross-check is the only mechanism in the codebase designed to break the self-attestation loop. Its instruction is exactly right — hand a second, independent model the raw signable bytes and tell it "Do NOT trust
payload.descriptionorpayload.decoded— the threat is precisely that the first agent narrates X while signing Y."That is the correct answer to the untrusted-verifier problem. It is scaffold.
Process defect underneath the code defect
#501 closed as delivered. What shipped was a renderer plus a green test over a flag nothing can set. The suite passes; the control does not exist. A passing test over dead scaffold is worse than no test — it reads as coverage.
Worth asking whether other closed security issues have the same shape (#460 is one — producer half only).
Ask
Related: #501 (closed), #460, #776.