Skip to content

Positioning suggestion: make the first ML job clearer #7

Description

@nathan-widjaja

isanagent has enough proof that I would avoid selling it first as a general “AI engineer.” The narrower first buyer seems more specific: someone with a fuzzy ML objective who needs a run artifact, not another chat answer.

A first-screen direction I would test:

Give isanagent a fuzzy ML objective; it researches, runs the notebook or job, measures what changed, and hands back a working artifact plus the evidence trail.

That would make the Colab examples and “talk is cheap / code that never ran” line land sooner. It also bridges the ALTAI story cleanly: the repo first promises a working ML artifact with evidence, and the broader train/deploy-on-your-own-infra platform can become the expansion path rather than the first thing the reader has to understand.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions