Too many undefined nodes in the 2D service topology #13914
-
As shown in the image above, how can I remove invalid topology nodes?
In a 3D scene, only the services I report can be displayed, but this is not possible in a 2D scene. The image below is a 3D illustration of the same topology scene. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 15 replies
-
|
Those nodes in your 2D should be the request target(e.g. domain name, IP address). Why do you want those unknown nodes gone? Those are real. 3D is just your INFRA 3D MAP, so, only known services. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Because we're using the tars framework, many tars requests are non-business-related. Since there are simply too many nodes in the diagram, a 2D model is practically unusable in our scenario. Is there no way to modify the configuration to simplify the topology diagram? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What configurations do you ask for? Hiding all remote systems? That will cause all outbound calls to disappear. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, I would like to hide the remote calls; is that currently possible? I’d like to configure it and see how it works. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We don't have that for now. But this could be considered for addition. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You could take a look at this PR. apache/skywalking-horizon-ui#56 I figured this out via this way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have another question. Suppose I have two systems that need to report to Skywalking. Currently, I see that it says to add "::" to the agent's name, but there's no way to display different entry points for different systems in the UI, right? As shown in the image below, there are two systems, CS and MARKI, but they are both displayed together. I would like them to be displayed separately. 
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Okay, thanks. I'll give it a try. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Since I am currently deploying the UI using a container image, and the latest image (docker pull ghcr.io/apache/skywalking-horizon-ui:75fcd327ed2ada0efe1267d8ff026f4640fb930b) appears to be from five days ago, I was wondering if you could build and push the image from the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
All images are available, there, according to the commit ID. You don't need me to build. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I reallized what was wrong. ASF changed its allowing list of pushing images, let me fix it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It is mentioned here that clicking on the SQL allows you to drill down to the trace, but nothing seems to happen when I click it. Is there a bug? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I will take a look. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is not a bug. This is something missed in the new UI built. I am adding it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is the new one from apache/skywalking-horizon-ui#58 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
All these PRs resolved the whole discussion |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All these PRs resolved the whole discussion