Audit existing CS decks

[o-ram]

General to-dos

1. Audit existing decks
2. Define the purpose of each one
3. Flag any gaps in decks that need creating

What needs some strategy/thought behind it:
-decks: what do have and what is each one used for
-what could use updates vs what needs archiving vs renaming
-who owns the decks / needs to be consulted

These may get split up into sub-issues as we further scope it out.

[o-ram]

Notes from @caitlinharper. cc @laneymangan

When DoH made their deck for Gillian, did we ever respond to DoH & include Gillian to say "Hey, we actually have a better version of this aka you should have just asked us?" And do we have a good (enough) version? Either building off the one Enza made or the one L&O made for the CS workshop? Long story short, I think we should have one working source-of-truth pitch deck (could also be used for a conference talk about the value of our CS program).

2. I think these paragraphs are pretty strong, and it might make sense to show in that deck how CS supports specific programs and share that we design entire campaign strategies to ensure a program/product's success.

Thoughts??

Response from myself:

Yes, we did let them know and the response was that GG wanted a different style of deck for Caltrans leadership and for DoH to tell that story, though there was acknowledgement that they should be working with us. We have a few different decks and we have talked about the need to audit those and make sure each one has a clear purpose. I'll be opening a Github issue for this and moving all these notes over there.

[laneymangan]

@o-ram take a look :)

[o-ram]

@laneymangan I marked this as in-progress and put it in sprint 23. I'm going to check with Caitlin in our next doc meeting and see how we feel about this, and then make further updates then. This should be taken care of as part of the larger doc audit we are doing

[AnthonyRollins]

@o-ram to check with Caitlin on this

[caitlinharper]

I'm moving this to Sprint 26, b/c handbooking has taken priority over deck review. Once we get Docs more organized, we can move onto Slides.