Brainstorm and scope out how the quarterly tier review process should change
- Align with the new reporting structure, so that the review helps feed reports
- Factors in needed quarterly updates to the customer journey, where AMs are updating where their agencies are along their journeys and why
Process notes:
Moving forward we want to:
- Do quarterly reviews that cover both tiers and journey placement
- Look at all agencies in these reviews
- For ones that are not "priority", can be a more cursory pass. For ones that are priorities, call out what you are doing with them right now
- Have a dashboard that we use to populate ONE spreadsheet for the quarterly review. Review takes place in spreadsheet and then any resulting updates are officially made in the CRM.
- Rough process
- At end of quarter, dashboard(s) are exported into a spreadsheet
- Review is prepped in s/sheet for looking at tier, journey, and assignment of agencies
- Review takes place
- Updates made in CRM
- Close out
Previous helpful notes for background context:
I created columns for each quarter (we already had Q1 and where we want them to end up in Q4/end of 2025). I duplicated Q1 for Q2. We can filter out all non-priority agencies and update for the 66 if there are updates.
All of Olivia’s agencies are at stage 8 (Payments/Benefits) and 3 might go to 9 in 2025 (get GTFS-RT), so no updates there
Basically the same for Laney, so this mostly for Nina and Marie
For the 66 priority agencies, I would report quarterly/monthly on quarter/month-over-quarter/month progress along the journey (rolled into existing report, ideally)
As simple as “X agencies moved along their journey, and if they did not, Y & Z are the main blockers” and here’s a snapshot of what 2025 looks like
For the ones that aren’t a priority in 2025, I recommend we (Caitlin/Enza) do quarterly newsletters to them in the first month of each quarter (January, April, July, October) to market what is upcoming/available to them, send additional announcements following up if needed (new MSAs or products, etc.), and/or if they’re really needed and could respond for/to a Campaign - otherwise we don’t do proactive outreach, but of course always respond if they reach out to Cal-ITP
Brainstorm and scope out how the quarterly tier review process should change
Process notes:
Moving forward we want to:
Previous helpful notes for background context:
I created columns for each quarter (we already had Q1 and where we want them to end up in Q4/end of 2025). I duplicated Q1 for Q2. We can filter out all non-priority agencies and update for the 66 if there are updates.
All of Olivia’s agencies are at stage 8 (Payments/Benefits) and 3 might go to 9 in 2025 (get GTFS-RT), so no updates there
Basically the same for Laney, so this mostly for Nina and Marie
For the 66 priority agencies, I would report quarterly/monthly on quarter/month-over-quarter/month progress along the journey (rolled into existing report, ideally)
As simple as “X agencies moved along their journey, and if they did not, Y & Z are the main blockers” and here’s a snapshot of what 2025 looks like
For the ones that aren’t a priority in 2025, I recommend we (Caitlin/Enza) do quarterly newsletters to them in the first month of each quarter (January, April, July, October) to market what is upcoming/available to them, send additional announcements following up if needed (new MSAs or products, etc.), and/or if they’re really needed and could respond for/to a Campaign - otherwise we don’t do proactive outreach, but of course always respond if they reach out to Cal-ITP