Describe the Enhancement
This issue arose from discussion dtcenter/METplus#3283 in which @mpm-meto encountered challenges running MET's TC-RMW tool using NetCDF inputs. Testing for that issue revealed some enhancements that could make running TC-RMW using NetCDF inputs easier. For this issue, recommend the following changes:
- Add a unit test for TC-RMW demonstrating the use of NetCDF inputs.
- Add more error checking to prevent TC-RMW from attempting to write to 4D data to a 3D variable. That resulted in corrupted output rather than a useful error message.
- Consider if/how writing
VR and VT for a single level should be supported. Currently TC-RMW only supports VR and VT for multiple pressure level outputs.
- Investigate and resolve the writing of some "false positive" warning messages, like this:
WARNING: MetNcCFDataFile::data_plane(VarInfo &, DataPlane &, LongArray &) -> for "x_wind_0" variable, the lead time does not match the requested lead time: (240000 != NA)
Refine the logic to prevent those from being written. When running with forecast model data and forecast tracks, yes, the lead time information should match. But when running with analysis data and BEST tracks, no, the lead times should not, and will not match. Those warning messages should be suppressed in that case.
Time Estimate
3 days?
Sub-Issues
Consider breaking the enhancement down into sub-issues.
Relevant Deadlines
List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.
Funding Source
Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.
Define the Metadata
Assignee
Labels
Milestone and Projects
Define Related Issue(s)
Consider the impact to the other METplus components.
Enhancement Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Describe the Enhancement
This issue arose from discussion dtcenter/METplus#3283 in which @mpm-meto encountered challenges running MET's TC-RMW tool using NetCDF inputs. Testing for that issue revealed some enhancements that could make running TC-RMW using NetCDF inputs easier. For this issue, recommend the following changes:
VRandVTfor a single level should be supported. Currently TC-RMW only supportsVRandVTfor multiple pressure level outputs.Refine the logic to prevent those from being written. When running with forecast model data and forecast tracks, yes, the lead time information should match. But when running with analysis data and BEST tracks, no, the lead times should not, and will not match. Those warning messages should be suppressed in that case.
Time Estimate
3 days?
Sub-Issues
Consider breaking the enhancement down into sub-issues.
Relevant Deadlines
List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.
Funding Source
Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.
Define the Metadata
Assignee
Labels
Milestone and Projects
Define Related Issue(s)
Consider the impact to the other METplus components.
Enhancement Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Branch name:
feature_<Issue Number>_<Description>Pull request:
feature <Issue Number> <Description>Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
Select: Milestone as the next official version
Select: MET-X.Y Development project for development toward the next coordinated release