You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have managed to replicate the results on the paper for English and German FastText. For reference, I am interested in the cross-lingual word similarity task. Results I got are (reporting spearman correlation):
Original FastText: 9%
Mapped FastText: 71%
However, I tried the same code on English and German GloVe embeddings and did not get much improvement. Results:
Original GloVe: 1%
Mapped GloVe: 3%
I have managed to replicate the results on the paper for English and German FastText. For reference, I am interested in the cross-lingual word similarity task. Results I got are (reporting spearman correlation):
Original FastText: 9%
Mapped FastText: 71%
However, I tried the same code on English and German GloVe embeddings and did not get much improvement. Results:
Original GloVe: 1%
Mapped GloVe: 3%
Any idea why this might be the case?