I've been using the Signtool module at work to sign some libraries for a while, and it's been working ok.
However, there are some changes to the way things work in progress, and that has apparently hit an issue in that the way it's set up requires the use of a 64bit/x64 version of signtool.exe, and the fake module is only looking in the 'x86' folder - https://github.com/fsprojects/FAKE/blob/master/src/app/Fake.Tools.SignTool/SignTool.fs#L358 - and the x64 versions are under {Environment.ProgramFilesX86}\Windows Kits\10\bin\**\x64" (note: they're still under the ProgramFilesX86 root, just in a different sub directory)
It works if I work out the path myself and pass that into FAKE rather than letting it work it out, but I thought it would be nice if something could be done to let it work automatically.
I had a quick go with a custom build that adds a new 'prefer 64bit option' in Numpsy@43a4679 and that has worked for me, but I don't know if that would work for an 'official' change... I'm thinking that simply changing it to use the x64 version on 64bit platforms all the time has scope for breaking something, so an explicit flag is safer.
I've been using the Signtool module at work to sign some libraries for a while, and it's been working ok.
However, there are some changes to the way things work in progress, and that has apparently hit an issue in that the way it's set up requires the use of a 64bit/x64 version of signtool.exe, and the fake module is only looking in the 'x86' folder - https://github.com/fsprojects/FAKE/blob/master/src/app/Fake.Tools.SignTool/SignTool.fs#L358 - and the x64 versions are under
{Environment.ProgramFilesX86}\Windows Kits\10\bin\**\x64"(note: they're still under the ProgramFilesX86 root, just in a different sub directory)It works if I work out the path myself and pass that into FAKE rather than letting it work it out, but I thought it would be nice if something could be done to let it work automatically.
I had a quick go with a custom build that adds a new 'prefer 64bit option' in Numpsy@43a4679 and that has worked for me, but I don't know if that would work for an 'official' change... I'm thinking that simply changing it to use the x64 version on 64bit platforms all the time has scope for breaking something, so an explicit flag is safer.