Skip to content

Consider more advanced views into the alignments in Template #207

@clintval

Description

@clintval

After fixing an issue in Template where records were added twice to different internal fields in this PR:

We might want to consider more specific "views" into the different categories of alignments for multi-mapping chimeric use cases.

Some ideas for useful ways to view the alignments for either the R1 or R2 ordinal:

  • Only primary (not secondary, not supplemental)
  • Only not primary (all secondary and supplementary)
  • Only secondary including "secondary supplementals"
  • Only secondary not including "secondary supplementals"
  • Only supplementary including "secondary supplementals"
  • Only supplementary not including "secondary supplementals"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions