-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathCommRingLec42.tex
More file actions
executable file
·90 lines (85 loc) · 3.8 KB
/
Copy pathCommRingLec42.tex
File metadata and controls
executable file
·90 lines (85 loc) · 3.8 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
\stepcounter{lecture}
\setcounter{lecture}{42}
\sektion{Lecture 42}
What we would've done next:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Generalized princepal ideal theorem: $R$ noetherian, $\p$ minimal prime over
$(a_1,\dots, a_n$, then $ht(\p)\le n$.\\
Corollary 1: $\spec R$ satisfies DCC (the length of a chain from $\p$ is bounded by
$ht(\p)< \infty$ ($R$ noetherian, so $\p$ is finitely generated)).\\
Corollary 2: $R$ local $\Rightarrow$ $\dim R< \infty$\\
(Nagata): There exist ``bad noetherian rings'' which are infinite dimensional noetherian
domains.
\item $R$ noetherian of dimension $n$ $\Longrightarrow$ $\dim R[x] = n+1$.\\
In general, $n+1\le \dim R[x] \le 2n+1$ (``Seidenberg bounds''), and these bounds are
tight.
\end{enumerate}
\begin{definition}
A ring $R$ is \emph{catenary} if given any two primes $\p\subsetneq \p'$, any two
maximal prime chains from $\p$ to $\p'$ have the same length.
\end{definition}
Nagata showed that there are noetherian domains which are not catenary.
\begin{definition}
If $\p\in \spec R$, then $\dim \p:= \dim R/\p$.
\end{definition}
\begin{theorem}
Any $k$-affine algebra $S$ is catenary (even if $S$ is not a domain). In fact, any
saturated prime chain from $\p$ to $\p'$ has length $\dim \p - \dim \p'$. If $S$ is a
domain, then all maximal ideals have the same height.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Consider any chain $\p\subsetneq \p_1\subsetneq \cdots \subsetneq \p_r = \p'$. Then we
get the chain
\[
S/\p \twoheadrightarrow S/\p_1 \twoheadrightarrow \cdots \twoheadrightarrow S/\p_r
= S/\p'
\]
Here $\p_i/\p_{i-1}$ is height 1 in $S/\p_{i-1}$, so each arrow decreases the
transcendence degree by exactly 1. Therefore, $tr.d._k S/\p' = tr.d._k S/\p -r$.
\[
r = tr.d._k S/\p - tr.d._k S/\p' = \dim S/\p - \dim S/\p' = \dim \p-\dim \p'.
\]
To get the last statement, take $\p=0$ and $\p'=\m$. Then we get that $ht(\m)=\dim S$.
\end{proof}
Note that the last statement fails in general.
\begin{example}
Take $S=k\times k[x_1,\dots, x_n]$. Then $ht(0\times k[x_1,\dots, x_n])=0$, but
$ht\bigl(k\times (x_1,\dots, x_n)\bigr) = n$.
\end{example}
But that example is not connected.
\begin{example}
$S = k[x,y,z]/(xy,xz)$.
\end{example}
But this example is not a domain. In general, for any prime $\p$ in any ring $S$, we
have
\[
ht(\p) + \dim \p \le \dim S.
\]
\begin{theorem}
Let $S$ be an affine algebra, with $\Min S = \{\p_1,\dots, \p_r\}$. Then the following
are equivalent.
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\dim \p_i$ are all equal.
\item $ht(\p)+\dim \p =\dim S$ for all primes $\p\in \spec S$. In particular, if $S$
is a domain, we get this condition.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
$(1\Rightarrow 2)$ $ht(\p)$ is the length of some saturated prime chain from $\p$ to
some minimal prime $\p_i$. This length is $\dim \p_i - \dim \p = \dim S - \dim \p$ (by
condition 1). Thus, we get $(2)$.
$(2\Rightarrow 1)$ Apply (2) to the minimal prime $\p_i$ to get $\dim \p_i=\dim S$ for
all $i$.
\end{proof}
We finish with a (non-affine) noetherian domain $S$ with maximal ideals of different
heights. We need the following fact.\\
\underline{Fact}: If $R$ is a ring with $a\in R$, then there is a canonical $R$-algebra
isomorphism $R[x]/(ax-1) \cong R[a^{-1}]$, $x\leftrightarrow a^{-1}$.
\begin{example}
Let $\bigl(R,(\pi)\bigr)$ be a DVR with quotient field $K$. Let $S=R[x]$, and assume
for now that we know that $\dim S=2$. Look at $\m_2=(\pi,x)$ and $\m_1=(\pi x-1)$.
Note that $\m_1$ is maximal because $S/\m_1 = K$. It is easy to show that
$ht(\m_1)=1$. However, $\m_2\supsetneq (x)\supsetneq (0)$, so $ht(\m_2)=2$.
\end{example}
Now let's come back to result I.1.1. The result we've just proven says that $ax-1\in
U(R[x])$ if and only if $a\in \nil R$.