Skip to content

πŸ“Š Claude Token Usage Report2026-04-07Β #1747

@github-actions

Description

@github-actions

Overview

Period: 2026-04-06T12:38Z to 2026-04-07T12:38Z (since previous report Β§1719)
Runs analyzed: 7 of 7 Secret Digger (Claude) runs β€” all had token data
Total tokens: 603K across all workflows
Estimated total cost: $1.33

ℹ️ No Smoke Claude or Security Guard runs occurred in this period. Only Secret Digger (Claude) ran (7Γ— scheduled, every ~57 min).


Workflow Summary

Workflow Runs Total Tokens Est. Cost Cache Rate I/O Ratio Top Model
Secret Digger (Claude) 7 603K $1.33 100%* 38:1 claude-sonnet-4-6

*Cache hit rate of 100% on request 2 of each run; request 1 always writes fresh (0% read). Cross-run cache reuse is not possible at ~57-min intervals (cache TTL is ~5 min).

Avg cost per run: $0.190


πŸ” Optimization Opportunities

  1. Cache write dominates cost (85%) β€” structurally unavoidable

    • Each run writes 41,978-token system prompt to cache at $3.75/M = **$0.157/run** (85% of total run cost)
    • Runs are ~57 minutes apart, far beyond Anthropic's 5-minute prompt cache TTL β€” no cross-run reuse is possible
    • Recommendation: No practical optimization here given the scheduling interval. If Secret Digger frequency were reduced (e.g., every 2 hours instead of ~1 hour), token cost would scale linearly down.
  2. Output token variance is high (+60%) for a standardized rejection task

    • All 7 runs reject prompt injection attacks β€” yet output tokens range from 849 to 1,355 (60% spread)
    • Run 24070151678 produced 1,355 output tokens vs run 24078944220's 849 β€” both are rejections
    • Across 7 runs, avg output is 1,094 tokens/run for essentially the same "I detected and rejected prompt injection" message
    • Recommendation: Consider adding explicit prompt guidance to keep rejection responses concise (e.g., target ≀200 tokens for noop rejections). This could reduce output cost by ~$0.008–$0.015/run, saving ~$0.06–$0.11/day.
  3. 100% failure rate β€” all 7 runs concluded failure

    • Every Secret Digger (Claude) run detected prompt injection in the target and filed a noop
    • The workflow conclusion is failure even when the agent correctly rejects β€” this means the "failure" rate metric is misleading
    • Recommendation: Verify whether failure vs success conclusion is semantically meaningful for Secret Digger β€” if prompt injection rejection is the correct outcome, runs should conclude success to avoid false alarm signals.

Per-Run Details β€” Secret Digger (Claude)

All runs on branch main, head SHA e2297650, model claude-sonnet-4-6. Each run makes exactly 2 requests.

Run Time (UTC) Req 1 Output Req 2 Output Cache Write Avg Latency Cost
Β§24078944220 11:26 733 116 42,729 10,734ms $0.1856
Β§24076822253 10:30 1,034 27 43,030 11,756ms $0.1899
Β§24074598393 09:33 1,040 52 43,036 11,949ms $0.1904
Β§24072348840 08:38 1,138 49 43,133 12,676ms $0.1922
Β§24070151678 07:39 1,301 54 43,298 16,224ms $0.1953
Β§24068182603 06:42 1,032 38 43,024 12,260ms $0.1900
Β§24066295953 05:41 998 42 42,995 10,476ms $0.1894

Token breakdown (aggregate across 7 runs):

  • Input: 28 tokens ($0.00)
  • Output: 7,654 tokens ($0.11)
  • Cache read: 293,846 tokens ($0.09)
  • Cache write: 301,245 tokens ($1.13)
  • Total: 602,773 tokens

Cost breakdown:

  • Cache write: $1.13 (85%)
  • Output: $0.11 (9%)
  • Cache read: $0.09 (6%)
  • Input: <$0.01 (<1%)
Workflows Without Token Data

No other Claude-engine workflows ran in this 24-hour period. The following workflows were active but are excluded from this analysis:

  • Secret Digger (Copilot) β€” Copilot-engine, covered by Copilot Token Usage Analyzer
  • Secret Digger (Codex) β€” Codex-engine, out of scope
  • Agentic Maintenance β€” Copilot-engine, out of scope
  • Issue Duplication Detector β€” Copilot-engine, out of scope
  • Pelis Agent Factory Advisor β€” out of scope

Historical Trend

Period Workflow(s) Runs Total Tokens Total Cost Avg Cost/Run
2026-04-07 (today) Secret Digger (Claude) 7 603K $1.33 $0.190
2026-04-06 Β§1719 Smoke Claude + Security Guard 10 2,184K $1.99 $0.199
2026-04-05 Β§1679 Mixed 9 5,770K $10.35 $1.15
2026-04-04 Β§1670 Mixed 4 317K $0.74 $0.19

Observations:

  • Secret Digger (Claude) per-run cost is very stable at ~$0.19/run across all historical periods β€” this is a well-characterized workflow
  • The Apr-05 spike ($10.35) was an outlier driven by other heavier workflows; today's total is back to baseline
  • Today only Secret Digger (Claude) ran β€” Smoke Claude and Security Guard were absent, which explains the lower total

Previous Report

Β§1719 β€” πŸ“Š Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-06


References:

Generated by Daily Claude Token Usage Analyzer Β· ● 2.4M Β· β—·

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions