[performance] Regression in ExtractWorkflowNameFromFile: +21.0% slower

[github-actions]

Benchmark: BenchmarkExtractWorkflowNameFromFile

Current Performance: 17,165 ns/op (17.16μs)
Historical Average: 14,190 ns/op (14.19μs)
Change: +21.0% slower
Historical Data Points: 2

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

• ns/op: 17,165 (was 14,190)
• Change: +21.0%
• Memory: 4,362 B/op, 8 allocs/op

Historical Values

Date	ns/op
2026-05-08	12,243
2026-05-09	16,138
2026-05-10 (today)	17,165

Note: Only 2 historical data points available. The benchmark was introduced on 2026-05-08. With limited history, this regression threshold crossing may reflect normal variance. Monitor closely.

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Monitor over the next few runs — only 2 historical data points, so confidence is low
2. If regression persists: review recent changes to ExtractWorkflowNameFromFile or related file path utilities
3. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles if needed

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: §25632111265
• Date: 2026-05-10
• Also noted: CompileSimpleWorkflow improved -29.9%, FindIncludesInContent improved -31.2%

Generated by Daily CLI Performance Agent · ● 8.8M · ◷

• expires on May 12, 2026, 3:15 PM UTC

[github-actions]

🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot

I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.

If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.

Om nom nom! 🍪

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · ● 58.5K · ◷