[performance] Regression in CompileComplexWorkflow: 203% slower

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Regression Detected

Benchmark: CompileComplexWorkflow

Current Performance: 15,754,984 ns/op (15.75ms)
Historical Average: 5,204,898 ns/op (5.20ms)
Change: +202.7% slower

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

• ns/op: 15,754,984 (was 5,204,898)
• Change: +202.7%
• Bytes/op: 8,407,021 B/op (was ~1,201,343 B/op)
• Allocs/op: 95,839 allocs/op (was ~10,296 allocs/op)
• Historical Data Points: 5

Baseline Targets

• Complex workflows: <500ms ✅ (still within target but 3× slower vs history)

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Review recent changes to the compilation pipeline (regression began ~June 11)
2. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles
3. Use go tool pprof to identify hotspots — memory also regressed 7× (1.2MB → 8.4MB)
4. Compare with previous benchmark results: benchstat

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: §27426858123
• Date: 2026-06-12
• Workflow: Daily CLI Performance
• First seen: 2026-06-11 (14.31ms), worsened 2026-06-12 (15.75ms)

---

Automatically generated by Daily CLI Performance workflow

Generated by ⚡ Daily CLI Performance Agent · 270 AIC · ⌖ 28.9 AIC · ⊞ 23.9K · ◷

• expires on Jun 14, 2026, 8:02 AM UTC-08:00

[copilot-swe-agent]

The agent encountered an error and was unable to start working on this issue: Please try again later, or contact support if the problem persists. (Request id: 1940:8041A:154C478:4F48781:6A2CCD6F)

[github-actions]

🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot

I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.

If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.

Om nom nom! 🍪

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · 41.7 AIC · ⌖ 11.7 AIC · ⊞ 24.3K · ◷