Workflow:
- if the respective gene/entity from our kidney list is in the ClinGen curated list apply this group and points after reviewing the entry
- if the respective gene/entity from our kidney list is NOT in the ClinGen list
- review GenCC and OMIM entries
- decide to split or lump if regarding modified ClinGen criteria if applicable
- decide for a MONDO term (when lumping decide for only 1 "new" MONDO term and report the former ones / when splitting decide for >1 new term per Gene as disease entities)
--> use MONDO (not OMIM or Orphanet) as primary disease ontology in the manual curation effort
--> shorten the process if actionable: Genes associated with a single published disease entity should only be curated for that condition (i.e. lumped) unless there are indications to split specific phenotypic features of a syndrome or variable phenotype into separate curation(s)
Scoring logic:
- if only screening publication then the category can't be more then Limited,
- if there is a clinical description then the category can be Moderate,
- if there is a clinical replication then the category can be Definitive
- DEFINITIVE: 12-18 points; Replication over time!?
- MODERATE: 7-11.99 points
- LIMITED: 0.1-6.99 points
- NO KNOWN RELATION: 0 points; contradictory evidence
--> access the curation strategy sheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KS9G2YR9U6uheu0zC-7zvMaSWCZv7UeVYh69BrkQK8M/edit#gid=0
TODO:
Workflow:
--> use MONDO (not OMIM or Orphanet) as primary disease ontology in the manual curation effort
--> shorten the process if actionable: Genes associated with a single published disease entity should only be curated for that condition (i.e. lumped) unless there are indications to split specific phenotypic features of a syndrome or variable phenotype into separate curation(s)
Scoring logic:
--> access the curation strategy sheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KS9G2YR9U6uheu0zC-7zvMaSWCZv7UeVYh69BrkQK8M/edit#gid=0
TODO: