When do we use "sdfXxx", when do we use "xxx"?

[cabo]

To get a consistent usage of terms, we probably should describe when we are prefixing new terms with "sdf" and when we don't.

[WAvdBeek]

a long time ago we decided to prefix new things that are not available in JSON schema. I think this still holds.

[cabo]

That would be one way to do this, but if we wanted to do this consistently, we'd have to prefix

unit scaleMinimum scaleMaximum readable writable observable nullable contentFormat subtype

as well.

[WAvdBeek]

maybe we should not have a mechanism, but just list what the deviations are with JSON
we could add another column in here:
https://onedm.org/terminology/

[nwidell]

Consistency rule, needed for 2.0 but not now

AK: what if JSON schema reuses any of our terms? eg things that might have different semantics.
CB: we are very specific with the terms we used
MJK: might be a conflict later

[akeranen]

Out of the list above seems contentFormat might be (future?) conflict. Need to check status of that with JSO.