Skip to content

docs(faq): add entry for workflow publish failing when basic info is missing - #1630

Merged
lyj715824 merged 1 commit into
iflytek:mainfrom
FenjuFu:faq/workflow-publish-missing-info
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

docs(faq): add entry for workflow publish failing when basic info is missing#1630
lyj715824 merged 1 commit into
iflytek:mainfrom
FenjuFu:faq/workflow-publish-missing-info

Conversation

@FenjuFu

@FenjuFu FenjuFu commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

Adds one FAQ entry to faq/features.md: clicking Publish on a workflow does nothing / fails.

The common cause from community support is that the workflow's basic info (name, etc.) hasn't been filled in on the orchestration page (top-left). Once completed, publishing works. Placed right before the existing "publish as API" entry.

Docs-only change.

…missing

A frequent question from community support: clicking Publish does nothing
or fails. The cause is that the workflow's basic info (name, etc.) has not
been filled in on the orchestration page. Added under Feature Usage,
alongside the existing publish-as-API entry.

Signed-off-by: FenjuFu <92919259+FenjuFu@users.noreply.github.com>
@FenjuFu

FenjuFu commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI triage: every code, test, CodeQL, DCO, and CLA check passed. The only failure is the repository-level claude-review action: its OIDC app-token exchange returned 401 Invalid OIDC token after three retries, and the action also warns that model is no longer a supported input. This is workflow/integration infrastructure, not a failure caused by this docs-only PR.

@lyj715824
lyj715824 merged commit f74f6b9 into iflytek:main Aug 25, 2026
31 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants