Replies: 1 comment
|
The community generally calls this a megamerge. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
When working on a feature branch, I like to keep independent code changes truly independent by making them in parallel commits, but eventually I need to combine them. I end up with the following commit graph with the
???commit being (approximately) empty:I always have trouble naming the
???commit: it seems reasonable to name it after the feature under development, but it also feels weird to have an empty commit named after the feature.Does anyone else have this struggle? How have you resolved it?
All reactions