-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
make sure we test LoadBalancers at scale #36773
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
area/provider/gcpIssues or PRs related to gcp providerIssues or PRs related to gcp providersig/cloud-providerCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider.sig/networkCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network.sig/scalabilityCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
area/provider/gcpIssues or PRs related to gcp providerIssues or PRs related to gcp providersig/cloud-providerCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider.sig/networkCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network.sig/scalabilityCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
#36720 removes the LoadBalancer tests from
gce-master-scale-correctnessbecause that job is actually too large for the tests to reliably work.We should still be regularly testing LoadBalancers at 1000 or 2000-node scale though.
(Also, when we say "testing LoadBalancers", we really mean "testing cloud-provider-gcp", because as discussed in #36720, in kube-proxy load balancer services don't scale any differently than any other kind of services; it's only the cloud provider where we need the extra testing.)
/sig scalability
/sig network
/sig cloud-provider
/area provider/gcp
cc @wojtek-t @aojea @bowei