feat(api): add stateless deploy endpoint (POST /api/deploy) #14
Annotations
12 warnings
|
checks
Node.js 20 actions are deprecated. The following actions are running on Node.js 20 and may not work as expected: actions/cache@v4, actions/checkout@v4, actions/setup-node@v4, pnpm/action-setup@v4. Actions will be forced to run with Node.js 24 by default starting June 2nd, 2026. Node.js 20 will be removed from the runner on September 16th, 2026. Please check if updated versions of these actions are available that support Node.js 24. To opt into Node.js 24 now, set the FORCE_JAVASCRIPT_ACTIONS_TO_NODE24=true environment variable on the runner or in your workflow file. Once Node.js 24 becomes the default, you can temporarily opt out by setting ACTIONS_ALLOW_USE_UNSECURE_NODE_VERSION=true. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2025-09-19-deprecation-of-node-20-on-github-actions-runners/
|
|
checks
The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128
|
|
checks:
components/file-browser.tsx#L152
The 'currentViewData' logical expression could make the dependencies of useCallback Hook (at line 621) change on every render. To fix this, wrap the initialization of 'currentViewData' in its own useMemo() Hook
|
|
checks:
components/file-browser.tsx#L152
The 'currentViewData' logical expression could make the dependencies of useCallback Hook (at line 542) change on every render. To fix this, wrap the initialization of 'currentViewData' in its own useMemo() Hook
|
|
checks:
components/file-browser.tsx#L152
The 'currentViewData' logical expression could make the dependencies of useCallback Hook (at line 424) change on every render. To fix this, wrap the initialization of 'currentViewData' in its own useMemo() Hook
|
|
checks:
components/file-browser.tsx#L152
The 'currentViewData' logical expression could make the dependencies of useCallback Hook (at line 366) change on every render. To fix this, wrap the initialization of 'currentViewData' in its own useMemo() Hook
|
|
checks:
app/repos/new/page.tsx#L325
Using `<img>` could result in slower LCP and higher bandwidth. Consider using `<Image />` from `next/image` or a custom image loader to automatically optimize images. This may incur additional usage or cost from your provider. See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-img-element
|
|
checks:
app/repos/new/page.tsx#L320
Using `<img>` could result in slower LCP and higher bandwidth. Consider using `<Image />` from `next/image` or a custom image loader to automatically optimize images. This may incur additional usage or cost from your provider. See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-img-element
|
|
checks:
app/repos/new/page.tsx#L280
Using `<img>` could result in slower LCP and higher bandwidth. Consider using `<Image />` from `next/image` or a custom image loader to automatically optimize images. This may incur additional usage or cost from your provider. See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-img-element
|
|
checks:
app/repos/new/page.tsx#L275
Using `<img>` could result in slower LCP and higher bandwidth. Consider using `<Image />` from `next/image` or a custom image loader to automatically optimize images. This may incur additional usage or cost from your provider. See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-img-element
|
|
checks:
app/repos/new/page.tsx#L210
Using `<img>` could result in slower LCP and higher bandwidth. Consider using `<Image />` from `next/image` or a custom image loader to automatically optimize images. This may incur additional usage or cost from your provider. See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-img-element
|
|
checks:
app/repos/new/page.tsx#L202
Using `<img>` could result in slower LCP and higher bandwidth. Consider using `<Image />` from `next/image` or a custom image loader to automatically optimize images. This may incur additional usage or cost from your provider. See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-img-element
|