Before creating a bug report please make check the following
Describe the bug
I'm on a riscv64 VM, testing the newly-added risc-v support :)
I set up a .fvmrc with { "flutter": "3.35.3" }, and try to run fvm install.
Everything seems to work, but after download I get:
✓ Flutter SDK: SDK Version : 3.35.3 installed! (95.2s)
Setting up Flutter SDK: 3.35.3
Missing "unzip" tool. Unable to extract Dart SDK.
Consider running "sudo apt-get install unzip".
✓ Flutter SDK: SDK Version : 3.35.3 is setup
[WARN] Flutter SDK is not setup, skipping resolve dependencies.
✓ Project now uses Flutter SDK : SDK Version : 3.35.3
It feels kind of weird that the SDK setup seems to fail, then gives me a checkmark that it works, then a warning about it not being setup, and then a checkmark that everything works.
IMHO this should fail more agressively ? Feel free to close if you don't think that this is relevant, but I feel like the current output is very confusing
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Set up a VM / container that does not have unzip
- Setup an fvmrc file
- Use fvm install
Expected behavior
The program would fail with an error message telling me to fix dependencies, or end on a warning that the SDK is not setup, without ever telling me that it is setup with a checkmark.
Logs
See above
Desktop (please complete the following information):
- OS: Ubuntu 26.04 Resolute Raccoon (Development Preview)
- FVM Version: 4.0.1 (latest release)
Additional context
After installing unzip, the SDK setup takes place.
However it downloads the arm64 sdk. This is a whole other bug... (#969)
Thank you for your work!
Before creating a bug report please make check the following
Describe the bug
I'm on a riscv64 VM, testing the newly-added risc-v support :)
I set up a .fvmrc with
{ "flutter": "3.35.3" }, and try to runfvm install.Everything seems to work, but after download I get:
It feels kind of weird that the SDK setup seems to fail, then gives me a checkmark that it works, then a warning about it not being setup, and then a checkmark that everything works.
IMHO this should fail more agressively ? Feel free to close if you don't think that this is relevant, but I feel like the current output is very confusing
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
The program would fail with an error message telling me to fix dependencies, or end on a warning that the SDK is not setup, without ever telling me that it is setup with a checkmark.
Logs
See above
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Additional context
After installing unzip, the SDK setup takes place.
However it downloads the arm64 sdk. This is a whole other bug... (#969)
Thank you for your work!