Skip to content

Commit b82704e

Browse files
committed
Add NOTES.md
Write-up of the plan, model choice, commit split, and what the self-review found for the update-user endpoint.
1 parent e74e3f5 commit b82704e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 35 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

NOTES.md

Lines changed: 35 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1+
# NOTES
2+
3+
## Plan
4+
5+
The approved plan added a `PUT /users/:id` route in `routes/users.js` and a matching
6+
`updateUser(id, { name, email })` helper in `db/store.js`, both mirroring the existing
7+
`GET /:id` and `POST /` handlers (same 404 shape, same "name and email are required" 400
8+
message). The plan specified validating input before doing the lookup, so a request with
9+
a missing field 400s even against a real id — that matched how the tests exercise each
10+
case independently, and I approved it as written without edits.
11+
12+
## Model
13+
14+
Used Claude Sonnet 5 for the whole task — plan, implementation, and review. The change is
15+
small and follows patterns already present in the codebase, so there was no need for a
16+
larger/slower model; Sonnet handled the plan-mode exploration and the route/store code
17+
without any back-and-forth.
18+
19+
## Commits
20+
21+
Split into three: `db/store.js` (the `updateUser` helper) first, then `routes/users.js`
22+
(the route that uses it), then this `NOTES.md` last. Store-then-route mirrors the
23+
dependency between them (the route can't be written meaningfully without the helper it
24+
calls), and keeping `NOTES.md` as its own commit means the write-up can honestly describe
25+
what actually happened during implementation and review rather than what was planned.
26+
27+
## Review
28+
29+
Ran a self-review (correctness, removed-behavior, cross-file, reuse/simplification/
30+
efficiency, altitude, conventions) against the two-file diff before pushing. Nothing came
31+
back: validation runs before the store lookup as planned, `Number(req.params.id)` on a
32+
non-numeric id degrades to `NaN`/not-found the same way the existing `GET /:id` handler
33+
already does, and the new store helper mutates the existing user record in place rather
34+
than duplicating any lookup logic. The review confirmed the implementation was clean
35+
rather than catching anything that needed fixing.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)