Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It seems like currently the extension is looking for direct BaseModel inheritance?
It's clear that it doesn't work with other base classes (that inherit from BaseModel):
Describe the solution you'd like
The set of base classes griffe_pydantic is trying to detect during static analysis should be configurable. For example:
extensions:
- griffe_pydantic:
extra_bases:
- sqlmodel.SQLModel
- dagster.ConfigDescribe alternatives you've considered
I've spent an hour trying to accomplish this together with Claude by making a custom extension using dynamic inspection, but couldn't make it work. That's probably a skill issue tho.
Additional context
I'm trying to use griffe_pydantic for my dagster-ray library and many of my objects inherit from dagster.Config which is a pydantic.BaseModel child class.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It seems like currently the extension is looking for direct
BaseModelinheritance?It's clear that it doesn't work with other base classes (that inherit from
BaseModel):Describe the solution you'd like
The set of base classes
griffe_pydanticis trying to detect during static analysis should be configurable. For example:Describe alternatives you've considered
I've spent an hour trying to accomplish this together with Claude by making a custom extension using dynamic inspection, but couldn't make it work. That's probably a skill issue tho.
Additional context
I'm trying to use
griffe_pydanticfor my dagster-ray library and many of my objects inherit fromdagster.Configwhich is apydantic.BaseModelchild class.