Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
what's purpose of having clang for mingw32 specifically? why not using GCC (as it's default), and why not using 64-bit clang from UCRT64 or CLANG64? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I was using Happy to learn what's a good replacement for this use case. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
https://www.msys2.org/news/#2023-12-13-starting-to-drop-some-32-bit-packages |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm referring to commit 5b14514 which removed
mingw-w64-i686-clang.cc @MehdiChinoune
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions