unclosed backtick starts a codespan

[mikesmithgh]

NVIM v0.10.0-dev-1500+g3128cff6b-dirty

For example, the line underlined by ^ is all highlighted as a codeblock even though there is no closing backtick

'<  `<			To the first line or character of the last selected
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  

Screenshot of motion.txt with set cole=0

The website repeats a character in this scenario

'<<			To the first line or character of the last selected

Screenshot of Neovim online help

See :h `<
See https://neovim.io/doc/user/motion.html#%60%3C

If you need any additional info please let me know 👍

[justinmk]

confirmed via :InspectTree, though I don't see how. The grammar rule is defined as requiring a closing backtick:

tree-sitter-vimdoc/grammar.js

Line 210 in 60045f7

codespan: ($) => _word($, /[^``\n]+/, '`', '`'),

[xian-wen]

Similar to the >, the text below > is highlighted as codeblock.

- the Visual area '< and '>
- line numbers in placed signs
- line numbers in quickfix positions
- positions in the |jumplist|
- positions in the |tagstack|
These items will still be adjusted:
- previous context mark ''
- the cursor position
- the view of a window on a buffer
- folds
- diffs

[clason]

These versions (and certainly Vim) do not use tree-sitter highlighting by default so this is irrelevant.