Skip to content

[Documentation]: Add CARTO to comparison page #1759

Description

@srtena

Before you start

What problem does this solve?

The comparison page mentions ArcGIS, Felt or Kepler.gl but misses CARTO which is a and a major contributor to the GIS ecosystem for cloud-native open formats and a major, strong player in browser-based visualization, analysis, and agentification of geospatial data.

Therefore, the comparison page might not feel accurate to industry experts.

Proposed solution

I'll add a simple follow-up PR with my proposed content.

Estimated scope

Small: a minor tweak, small UI change, or text adjustment

Alternatives considered

Hi @giswqs! 👋

This is Alex Tena, Director of Product @ CARTO.

First of all, congrats for the work on GeoLibre — It's an amazing project and we're extremely happy to see the space get traction, interest and movement. I personally think the approach is very interesting, and we're also excited about what open formats and open visualization libraries can do (like our work on deck.gl, Geoparquet, Raquet, and more recently, Portolan) for geospatial, especially about democratizing and lowering the threshold for anyone to do GIS.

This is a no-hard feelings issue. If you feel like CARTO should not be represented in this comparison, so be it.

But I think that your intention was to make an accurate representation and guidance of the GIS browser apps space and how GeoLibre can fit into that mix of open source and established commercial players like CARTO.

Happy to chat any time about this (here's my Linkedin) or about anything geo.
Keep up the great work!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions