Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Looking at the website https://www.peterborgapps.com/lingon/ the numbering system was confusing it moved from Lingon to Lingon-X this wasn't the version number and most people look at X as the roman numeral for 10. After Lingon X 9 the numbering has changed there is now a Lingon 10 on App Store (only) and Lingon Pro 10 download only from the website the latter cannot be on the App Store because it breaks Apples guidelines for some of its more powerful features. However, it is signed and notarised. Both are commercial. So brew can only serve up to Lingon X 9 and Lingon Pro 10 not Lingon 10 leaving a gap There is also the scenario where someone has brought Lingon-X 9 in the past not upgraded to Pro 10 and might wish to reinstall. So I would lean toward a separate cask. Normally Brew can use aliases to point old names to a new cask this is great but cannot take into account things like licensing when tied into versioning. Ideal world I guess you would use Lingon-X@9, Lingon-X@8 etc and Lingon-Pro@10 but I don't feel many people like this though. brew used to have a tap for different versions of casks I think its abandoned. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Output of
brew configOutput of
brew doctorDescription of issue
I see that the cask lingon-x is on version 9 of the App. The app has been renamed to Lingon Pro for version 10. Does this require a new cask? Should the old cask be renamed? I'm willing to try writing a cask (this would be my first time, so if someone can do this more quickly, I wouldn't say no), but not sure the best way to deal with an app being renamed.
Relevant casks
lingon-x
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions