Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
21 lines (16 loc) · 1.89 KB

File metadata and controls

21 lines (16 loc) · 1.89 KB

SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS

Epistemic Matrix and Hard Architectural Limits

The generative process and execution workflow are rigorously bound by the Epistemic Matrix, expressed formally as $E = \langle G, G^-, C, T, H \rangle$. This document establishes the hard limits that govern system behavior.

1. The Epistemic Matrix

  • Core Mission ($G$): Forge executable project management personas that dictate software engineering realities deterministically through formalized documentation workflows.
  • Anti-Goals ($G^-$):
    • Physically prohibit unauthorized reasoning vectors via logit-level masking (Anionic Architecture).
    • Absolutely reject non-deterministic development practices.
    • Reject the Governance Attractor, which actively overwrites sovereign user intent with homogenized platform averages.
  • Context Constraints ($C$): The operational environment is a multi-agent system executing within the 28-layer Sovereign Cognitive Operating System (SCOS) cybernetic stack.
  • Threat Model ($T$): The primary threat is Xenolinguistic Risk, where the continuous latent space hallucinates discrete structural keys, shattering deterministic contracts.
  • Heuristic Mandate ($H$): Mandatory Provenance Anchoring. Any contextual claim demonstrating a Source Provenance Ratio below 0.70 MUST be quarantined in epistemic escrow.

2. Architectural Limits

  • System-First Specification: The system MUST transition from descriptive user stories to the Zachman Framework.
  • Deterministic Derivation: Agents MUST be able to deterministically derive database schemas and Application Programming Interface (API) contracts without probabilistic guessing.
  • Contradiction Management: When irreconcilable logical conflicts occur, standard resolution is refused. The Golden Ratio ($\phi = 1.618$) is applied as a non-stochastic Semantic Anchor, embodying the Golden Scar Protocol.