Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (121 loc) · 4.3 KB

File metadata and controls

152 lines (121 loc) · 4.3 KB
tools
read
write
edit
grep
bash
arguments $QUERY

WFGY Formula All - Complete Reasoning Pipeline

Apply all four WFGY formula modules (BBMC, BBPF, BBCR, BBAM) in sequence for comprehensive semantic reasoning.

Based on the WFGY project: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY

Module Pipeline

  1. BBMC - Semantic Residue Minimization
  2. BBPF - Multi-Path Progression
  3. BBCR - Collapse-Rebirth Correction (if needed)
  4. BBAM - Attention Modulation

Instructions

  1. Initialize Pipeline

    • Parse input query: "$QUERY"
    • Load system configuration from .wfgy/config.json
    • Check all modules are initialized
    • Create pipeline session in .wfgy/sessions/
    • Set up monitoring for each module
  2. Phase 1: BBMC (Minimization)

    • Calculate initial semantic residue
    • Apply formula: B = I - G + m * c²
    • Minimize ||B||₂ through iteration
    • Record residue metrics
    • Pass optimized state to BBPF
  3. Phase 2: BBPF (Multi-Path)

    • Generate N parallel reasoning paths
    • Apply: x_next = x + Σ V_i + Σ(W_j * P_j)
    • Weight and rank paths by probability
    • Select top paths for synthesis
    • Check for divergence requiring BBCR
  4. Phase 3: BBCR (Correction)

    • Monitor for collapse conditions:
      • ||B|| ≥ 0.85 (high residue)
      • f(S) < 0.01 (stalled progression)
      • Logic contradictions detected
    • If triggered:
      • Execute collapse-reset-rebirth cycle
      • Preserve valid components
      • Return to stable state
    • Continue to BBAM
  5. Phase 4: BBAM (Attention)

    • Analyze attention distribution
    • Apply: â_i = a_i * exp(-0.618 * std(a))
    • Focus on critical elements
    • Balance attention across concerns
    • Generate final optimized output
  6. Integration and Output

    • Synthesize results from all modules
    • Calculate overall metrics:
      • Total semantic tension (ΔS)
      • Logic vector direction (λ)
      • Stability score
      • Confidence level
    • Create semantic node if recording active
    • Generate comprehensive report

Output Format

WFGY Complete Formula Analysis
═══════════════════════════════════════
Query: "$QUERY"

Module Results:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Module │ Status    │ Key Metric        │
├────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ BBMC   │ ✓ Applied │ Residue: 0.32     │
│ BBPF   │ ✓ Applied │ Paths: 5          │
│ BBCR   │ ○ Skipped │ Stable            │
│ BBAM   │ ✓ Applied │ Focus: 0.78       │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘

Semantic Analysis:
- Tension (ΔS): [value]
- Logic Vector (λ): [direction]
- Confidence: [percentage]%
- Risk Zone: [Safe/Transitional/Risk/Danger]

Primary Reasoning Path:
[Main conclusion from analysis]

Alternative Paths (from BBPF):
1. [Alternative approach]
2. [Alternative approach]

Key Focus Points (from BBAM):
• [Critical element 1]
• [Critical element 2]
• [Critical element 3]

Optimized Response:
[Final synthesized reasoning with all optimizations applied]

Semantic Node Created: [Yes/No]
Node ID: [if created]

Performance Metrics

Expected improvements over baseline:

  • Reasoning accuracy: +22.4%
  • Chain validity: +42.1%
  • Stability: 3.6× increase
  • Hallucination events: Significantly reduced

Advanced Options

# Run with custom parameters
/wfgy:formula-all "query" --paths 10 --gamma 0.5 --threshold 0.7

# Run with verbose logging
/wfgy:formula-all "query" --verbose

# Run with specific module emphasis
/wfgy:formula-all "query" --emphasize bbpf

Use Cases

  • Complex multi-step reasoning tasks
  • Problems requiring both creativity and precision
  • Situations with high uncertainty
  • Tasks needing attention optimization
  • Full semantic analysis of concepts

Integration

After running formula-all:

  • /semantic:node-build to record the complete analysis
  • /semantic:tree-view to see reasoning history
  • /boundary:detect to verify knowledge boundaries
  • /reasoning:chain-validate to confirm logic consistency