StarkRamsey #1346
jevillegasdatTII
started this conversation in
Ideas
StarkRamsey
#1346
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
We can certainly do that! Note Resonator Stark shift: We could even consider if it's worth trying to Stark-shift through the resonator. The advantage should be a larger coupling, and thus a larger dynamical range for the qubit frequency. The downside is instead related to the depletion time: we mostly want to read a depleted resonator, but if we populate it on purpose to Stark-shift the qubit we want it not to be depleted during the experiment. Thus, we should wait for depletion after the drive sequence - but we can not wait too much because of the coherence (which unfortunately it should scale together with the depletion time...) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Can we implement a Stark shift Ramsey like https://qiskit-community.github.io/qiskit-experiments/stable/0.7/manuals/characterization/stark_experiment.html
And then we can have also a T2 vs Startk_shifted frequency routine (or just use thee T2* from the previous one). This is very useful to characterize TLS spectrum for fixed frequency qubits.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions