Container runtime support

[koenkooi]

It would be nice to have support for containers in your images. The question is which runtime to we pick: docker-moby, podman or something else.

[lumag]

I'd vote for podman.

[ndechesne]

As much as I would also want to vote for podman, given the current use cases we have, and the current users, I think it's 'better' to use docker for now.

[lool]

Debian images carry docker from the docker.io Debian package; I vote for Incus!

[lumag]

As much as I would also want to vote for podman, given the current use cases we have, and the current users, I think it's 'better' to use docker for now.

Why? My feeling was that podman can completely replace docker.

[vkraleti]

No strong opinion but Qualcomm Linux 1.0 supports docker. May be it is good to algin.

[lumag]

No strong opinion but Qualcomm Linux 1.0 supports docker. May be it is good to algin.

Did you have any pro et contra when selecting docker for QLI 1.0?

[ricardosalveti]

The normal user expectation we currently have is more aligned with 'docker' (part of qli downstream, foundries images, etc), so I would vote for that to be the default from the distro perspective.

[github-actions]

This issue has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. Please add a comment and close if it is resolved or if it is no longer relevant.