You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm fully for replacing foo.len() == 0 with foo.is_empty(), but I find the negation in !foo.is_empty() harder to read than foo.len() > 0. Hence, I would prefer the first usage to be warned about, but not the second one.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm fully for replacing
foo.len() == 0withfoo.is_empty(), but I find the negation in!foo.is_empty()harder to read thanfoo.len() > 0. Hence, I would prefer the first usage to be warned about, but not the second one.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions