You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
* Revamp best-practices landing page and fix section inconsistencies
The best-practices index only listed 7 of the section's 11 pages and gave no
framing for how they relate. Regroup the index into four intro'd sections
(namespace/tenancy/capacity, security, worker/workflow reliability,
organizational enablement), relocate multi-tenant-patterns.mdx into
best-practices/ where it's already tagged and cross-linked as belonging, and
copyedit managing-aps-limits.mdx, security-controls.mdx, managing-namespace.mdx,
and cloud-access-control.mdx for heading-case and word-choice consistency with
the rest of the section.
* Apply suggestion from @lennessyy
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ In the case that you are using multiple certificates signed by the same CA, and
52
52
53
53
One convention is to give certificates a common name that matches the namespace. If you do this when using the same CA for dev and prod, then you can leverage Certificate Filters to prevent access to production environments. This is described in detail under the [authorization section](/cloud/certificates#control-authorization) of the documentation.
54
54
55
-
## Best practices
55
+
## Recommendations
56
56
57
57
### Establish clear guidelines on authentication methods
58
58
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ The way you partition Namespaces should usually match the way you partition mach
96
96
granular.
97
97
98
98
For more on topology tradeoffs, see [Namespace best practices](/best-practices/managing-namespace) and
0 commit comments