Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
executable file
·
421 lines (265 loc) · 6.92 KB

File metadata and controls

executable file
·
421 lines (265 loc) · 6.92 KB

Tetcore Governance Constitution

Protocol-Level Governance Framework

Version 1.0


0. Purpose

The Tetcore Governance Constitution defines:

  • The validator governance model
  • The proposal lifecycle
  • Voting mechanics
  • Emergency procedures
  • Upgrade procedures
  • Economic policy modification rules
  • Contract capability governance
  • Constitutional invariants

This constitution governs protocol evolution while preserving deterministic execution and safety.

Governance is embedded into the protocol state machine.


1. Governance Principles

1.1 Deterministic Governance

All governance actions must be:

  • Represented as transactions
  • Executed by the Protocol Kernel
  • Deterministic
  • Replay-stable

No off-chain governance has authority unless ratified on-chain.


1.2 Sovereignty

Tetcore governance is independent from external chains or token voting systems.

Authority derives solely from protocol-defined governance participants.


1.3 Separation of Roles

Governance authority is divided into:

  • Validator Council
  • Model Owner Council
  • Emergency Committee (optional configuration)

Networks may configure governance structure, but must preserve core invariants.


2. Governance Entities

2.1 Validator Council

Validators:

  • Participate in BFT consensus
  • Vote on protocol proposals
  • Ratify upgrades
  • Approve policy changes

Validator membership is governed through protocol rules.


2.2 Model Owner Council

Active model owners (of active versions) may have governance weight depending on configuration.

Weight function example:

[ Weight(owner) = ActiveModelsOwned ]

Networks may configure weight formula.


2.3 Emergency Committee (Optional)

A limited authority body able to:

  • Pause specific modules
  • Freeze contracts
  • Trigger emergency halts

Emergency actions are temporary and must be ratified by Validator Council within defined window.


3. Proposal Types

Governance proposals are typed.

3.1 Core Proposal Types

  • AddValidator
  • RemoveValidator
  • UpdatePricingPolicy
  • UpdateRevenuePolicy
  • ModifyVaultRules
  • ContractCapabilityChange
  • ParameterChange
  • ProtocolUpgrade
  • EmergencyPause
  • ResumeOperation

Each proposal type maps to deterministic state changes.


4. Proposal Lifecycle

State machine:

Proposed → Voting → Timelocked → Executed → Finalized

Or:

Proposed → Voting → Rejected


4.1 Proposal Creation

Transaction:

GovernancePropose {
  proposalType,
  payload,
  executeAfterHeight
}

Requirements:

  • proposer must meet governance eligibility
  • deposit required (optional)
  • payload must pass validation

4.2 Voting Phase

Voting window defined:

[ VotingEnd = ProposalHeight + VotingPeriod ]

Votes recorded:

GovernanceVote {
  proposalId,
  support: bool
}

4.3 Quorum Rules

Let:

[ TotalWeight = \sum weights ]

A proposal passes if:

[ VotesFor ≥ QuorumThreshold ]

Where:

[ QuorumThreshold = q · TotalWeight ]

Default q = 2/3 for critical proposals.


5. Timelock Mechanism

All successful proposals enter timelock.

[ ExecuteHeight ≥ ProposalHeight + TimelockPeriod ]

Timelock ensures:

  • auditability
  • dispute window
  • client upgrade window

Emergency proposals may reduce timelock but require higher quorum.


6. Upgrade Governance

Protocol upgrades modify:

  • VM version
  • Instruction set
  • Gas schedule
  • Runtime modules
  • State schema

Upgrade proposals must include:

  • new protocol version identifier
  • migration function hash
  • activation height

Upgrade execution requires:

[ ≥ 2/3 ValidatorWeight ]


7. Parameter Governance

Parameters subject to governance:

  • Gas cost schedule
  • Challenge window length
  • Default pricing coefficients
  • Maximum vault allocation
  • Maximum contract size
  • Relay reward parameters

Parameter changes must preserve safety invariants.


8. Capability Governance

Contracts rely on capabilities.

Governance may:

  • Add new capability types
  • Revoke capability types
  • Restrict capability to specific contracts
  • Modify capability gas costs

Capability changes cannot retroactively invalidate executed transactions.


9. Emergency Procedures

9.1 Emergency Pause

EmergencyPause may:

  • Halt new prompt submissions
  • Halt contract deployments
  • Freeze specific modules

Must be ratified by Validator Council within:

[ EmergencyWindow ]

Otherwise auto-expire.


9.2 Chain Halt

Full chain halt requires:

[ ≥ 3/4 ValidatorWeight ]

Used only for catastrophic failure.


10. Governance Security Invariants

Invariant 1: Protocol upgrades must not violate deterministic execution.

Invariant 2: Governance cannot mint tokens beyond defined supply rules.

Invariant 3: Revenue routing sums must remain equal to 100%.

Invariant 4: Model root commitments cannot be altered by governance.

Invariant 5: Governance cannot modify historical blocks.


11. Governance State Representation

On-chain object:

GovernanceState =
(
  proposals,
  votes,
  parameters,
  validatorSet,
  emergencyStatus,
  protocolVersion
)

All transitions occur via deterministic application of governance transactions.


12. Slashing and Accountability

Validators may be penalized for:

  • Double signing
  • Invalid block proposal
  • Failure to participate (optional configuration)

Slashing rules must be explicitly defined in parameter governance.


13. Constitutional Amendments

The Governance Constitution itself may be amended via:

  • Supermajority vote (≥ 3/4)
  • Extended timelock
  • Explicit “ConstitutionAmendment” proposal type

Amendments must preserve:

  • Determinism
  • Safety invariants
  • Identity scheme

14. Governance and Intelligence Infrastructure

Governance exists to:

  • Maintain protocol stability
  • Enable safe upgrades
  • Preserve economic fairness
  • Protect model ownership rights
  • Protect vault participant rights

It must not:

  • Centralize intelligence control
  • Override deterministic execution
  • Confiscate assets without defined slashing rule

15. Governance Liveness

Assuming:

  • ≥ 2/3 honest validator weight
  • Functional network connectivity

Then:

  • Valid proposals eventually resolve
  • Passed proposals eventually execute

Conclusion

The Tetcore Governance Constitution establishes a deterministic, sovereign, protocol-native governance system.

It ensures:

  • Upgrade safety
  • Economic integrity
  • Capability control
  • Validator accountability
  • Long-term infrastructure stability

Governance is not external to the protocol.

It is part of the state machine.